* Simon Perreault <si...@per.reau.lt> [2014-04-29 14:41]: > Le 2014-04-28 18:53, Chris Cappuccio a écrit : > >> Why is the burden on everyone to provide 'valid' objections? Should > >> not the burden be on you to at least hint at a point to this change? > >> Given the miniscule IPv6 usage out there, why should IPv6 come first? > > > > I like how IPv6 support turns primary and secondary DNS caches from > > a redundancy feature for clients to dual points of failure (for some > > resolver implementations.) No response from either server for the first > > AF you try? Just wait for a full time out before you try the second AF! > > This is a valid point IMHO. > > Wouldn't it be better if libasr would run A and AAAA requests in > parallel? Whichever response arrives first "wins".
no, since that gives extremely unpredictable results. -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services GmbH, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services. Dedicated Servers, Root to Fully Managed Henning Brauer Consulting, http://henningbrauer.com/
