Le 2014-04-28 18:53, Chris Cappuccio a écrit : >> Why is the burden on everyone to provide 'valid' objections? Should >> not the burden be on you to at least hint at a point to this change? >> Given the miniscule IPv6 usage out there, why should IPv6 come first? > > I like how IPv6 support turns primary and secondary DNS caches from > a redundancy feature for clients to dual points of failure (for some > resolver implementations.) No response from either server for the first > AF you try? Just wait for a full time out before you try the second AF!
This is a valid point IMHO. Wouldn't it be better if libasr would run A and AAAA requests in parallel? Whichever response arrives first "wins". Simon
