Tobias Heider <[email protected]> wrote: > > Though using SHA1 in combination with HAMC as pseudorandom function is > > perfectly fine as of today.
Can't even spell HMAC.
Tobias Heider <[email protected]> wrote: > > Though using SHA1 in combination with HAMC as pseudorandom function is > > perfectly fine as of today.
Can't even spell HMAC.