Hi Jackie

I totally agree with you on this.  Actually, the SMA policy which Freedom 
Scientific, GW Micro, Dolphin Computer Access and others employ is probably 
questionable under UK law but, as the originating company is not bound by that 
legislation, their dealerships get away with it.

As for the resetting of tokens being open to piracy, that’s true in a way.  But 
let me tell you something.  Duxbury Systems don’t seem to be doing too badly 
and they use that technique.  I have used DBT for over 10 years now, and I find 
their upgrades policies to be most fair.  When Duxbury Inc. issues a new 
release, it’s packed with features.  Those features are not the bells and 
whistles we see in Jaws, Window-Eyes and even Hal/Supernova.  Actually I find 
Supernova to be a very over-rated product in itself.  I own a current copy 
because I must, my livelihood dictates that I have the source material 
available to tutor others.  By others, I mean colleagues and pupils alike in 
the Primary school where I am now employed.  I’m expected to know how to use 
all of these accessibility products and I must not be found wanting in that 
regard.

Suffice it to say that I’m fairly conversant with VoiceOver on Apple’s 
platform.  :)

I’m even quite so with GW Micro’s Window-Eyes. :)

I am also I would venture to suggest fully conversant with Hal/Supernova.  That 
said, a trained monkey wouldn’t find it too difficult to become conversant with 
those products. ;-)

My next nut to crack is Jaws.  I freely admit that at this point I probably 
have quite a lot to learn in that respect.  I also know though that I will be 
the “proud”, (maybe not) owner of a Jaws license within as many days as it 
takes Sight And Sound to get their proverbial fingers out and deliver me my 
ordered copy, courtesy of Access To Work.

Oh yes, and I almost forgot to mention those good folks at Serotek.  They don’t 
charge a bean for upgrading if you’ve bought their screen-reader or their other 
applications such as DocuScan Plus for Mac and PC.  If those organisations can 
do it, why can’t Freedom, GW and Dolphin?  I really wish that the US and EU 
legislators would get it together with Witch, and whatever the US equivalent 
organisation is called, and really do something to rebut these companies to 
prevent them from acting like proverbial bandits.  Dick Turpin would have been 
proud to be associated with any of them.  I’m sure you’ve heard the old joke 
Jackie, but I’ll very quickly reprieve it from the archives of not that funny 
but, often, appropriate humour:
Q.  What did the director of Freedom Scientific say when he was accosted in the 
UK by an angry customer demanding his money back?
A.  “I’m the ghost of David Crocket … this Pound note stays in my pocket!” ;-)

OK, yes, I know, it’s outdated, but you get the idea I’m sure.  Oh yes, and I’m 
not Freedom-bashing, not specifically anyway.  I just happen to think that 
their practices and procedures are in need of a consumer-friendly overhaul.  
Perhaps that would help to restore their increasingly precarious position 
within the field of assistive accessibility.  After all, NVDA now has some 
highly skilled programmers supporting it, and actually given that the software 
is being developed actively, and given that all they ask is a donation now and 
then, it’s darn good value for money.  I have frequently said my piece in our 
groups regarding Australians.  Well, not all of them, but some of them.  I 
really dislike their totally false but high sounding self-importance is terms 
of global leadership etc.  They seem to believe also that they are a class or 
two above everybody else, again, totally false.  However, I have to give the 
developers of NVDA a great deal of credit for what they are seeking to achieve. 
 They have turned what was once a very inferior product into a very viable 
option to the others in its class and on its platform.  Indeed, I personally 
helped the head of the Visually Impaired department at the King’s Academy in 
Middlesbrough to remove Jaws from every computer on their network, after he 
took office in September of 2012.  We told Freedom Scientific what they could 
do with their highly over-priced site license.  We removed it as I say not only 
from the desktop machines, but also from every single school-owned laptop.  We 
replaced it with NVDA which is now the standard in not only that school but an 
increasing number of others with similarly forward-thinking and financially 
squeezed heads of department within the UK.  I have lobbied quite a few of them 
to the effect that their budgets are being squeezed tighter and tighter with 
every passing year by central government and local councils alike.  It is time 
that more of them got the message, and now that seems to be happening.  I work 
for one such head of department and she trusts my judgement, so she told me in 
an E-Mail just this morning.  We don’t have Jaws at work, simply because the 
money isn’t there and in any case, well, I’ve said it all already.

But yes, the remaining budget needs to be spent not on lining the pockets of 
those who walk on the stratospheric moon, but on the education of our clients, 
the children we so loyally serve.  We are there to provide for their academic 
needs, not, as I say, to help the rich get richer!  Jill, my boss, and I both 
believe that the children are our number 1 concern and priority.  I honestly 
believe we can, after all, change the world.  What a different place the world 
would be if only others took a similarly courageous stance.  I refer to both 
private individuals and others, in education and even commerce, the world over. 
 What, I wonder, would Freedom Scientific and its fat cat proprietors do then?

But to elude just for a moment back to the point I made earlier, or rather, my 
speculative point, In other words, Sight And Sound won’t be able to smugly rely 
on their several thousand Pound contributions to their economy for much longer. 
 I’ll tell you something else as well.  I have reason to believe that Sight And 
Sound may be in some degree of financial difficulty.  I can’t say much more on 
that one on list, but it wouldn’t surprise me in the least if we were to see 
some radical change in dealerships in the second or third quarter of this year.

Anyway, rant over.  In summary Jackie, well said, and it would seem that you 
and I have much in common in terms of our views regarding assistive 
technologies.

Kind regards

<--- Gordon Smith --->

<[email protected]>

Information Technology Accessibility Consultant;
Providing Help & Support To Young People LivingWith Visual Impairment, plus 
Braille Transcription services.

On 15 Dec 2013, at 10:53, Jackie Brown <[email protected]> wrote:

I agree with your comments regarding Freedom and their practices.  I have
had enough of paying £125 every two releases of a product that is just full
of bells and whistles most people don't use in their day-to-day lives.  The
argument Freedomites use is that R and D costs a lot of money, which is why
they charge what they do for their updates.  But I started my JAWS journey
from 3.2 in 1999.  Since then, I could have bought the product over and over
with the outlay I have put into it, and that is only me, one individual
among thousands.  The worst bit of it all is that if you choose to skip an
upgrade for whatever reason, there is no margin for doing so with Freedom,
you are just penalised and pay more next time you upgrade.  In fairness to
K1000, if you jump from say version 5 to version 13, you are only charged
the same amount you would need to fork out for if you moved from version 12
to 13.  In my view at least, this is fairer.

And on the subject of the Freedom ILM system, you can't even send your token
back to the Internet, even though there is an icon to do it within JAWS.
How ridiculous is that?  I used to use a Braille translation package called
Braille Maker, and whenever I was doing maintenance to my computer, I would
send its only token back to the server to protect it from being corrupted.
Once I had done the necessary and obligatory cleanups, I retrieved it.  Why
can't Freedom be like that?  I asked Eric Damary about it once, and he said
they had decided not to allow this method because it was open to piracy!


=======================================

The Techno-Chat E-Mail forum is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus and 
worm-free

To modify your subscription options, please visit for forum's dedicated web 
pages located at
http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/techno-chat

You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Techno-Chat group at 
either of the following websites:

http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/techno-chat/index.html

Or:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
you may also subscribe to this list via RSS.  The feed is at:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml>

---------------------------------------

Reply via email to