Muhamad Carlos Patriawan wrote: > Budi Rahardjo wrote: > > On 12/31/05, Muhamad Carlos Patriawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Balik lagi,RD di pers hitek tanpa paten sebagai output sangat > > > memungkinkan.Saya bisa tunjuk pers mana yg output engineeringnta tinggi > > > dengan paten submission yg rendah dan dilain pihak,persh mana yg > > > engring outputnya rendah tapi bagian patentnya sibuk terus karena > > > patent submission yg tinggi. :) > > > > Tinggal baca saja Newsweek edisi 2006 ini. > > > > Paten IBM dalam 1 tahun: 3000 paten. > > Artinya sekitar 10 paten setiap harinya. > > Mengapa mereka balik haluan dan mendukung open source? > > (Ini contoh paten jalan terus, open source jalan juga.) > > Hayo... kenapa? > > > > > HAHAHAHA. sorry ngakak karena ini buka inti permasalahan :) > > Persis,persh hitek banyak paten tapi gak produksi devais/produk dan > gak berhasil jualan,contohnya ya yang diatas :-)) .... ada banyak > bangeet Pak contoh persh hitek/ startup yang patennya submissionya > rendah,inovasinya tinggi,gak mencontek patent ,patent submissionya > rendah dan LEADING di market. >
Ini saya tambahkan kenapa banyaknya patent itu probably equal with evil and doesn't really equal with engineering output,lihat keyword "hit list" dibawah: Dalam kasus IBM vs Sun,lihat "strategy" yang digunakan ***sebagian*** "big corporation" dalam 'mengancam' persh hitek lain yang lebih kecil (tapi lebih inovatif) http://www.forbes.com/asap/2002/0624/044.html ....... An awkward silence ensued. The blue suits did not even confer among themselves. They just sat there, stonelike. Finally, the chief suit responded. "OK," he said, "maybe you don't infringe these seven patents. But we have 10,000 U.S. patents. Do you really want us to go back to Armonk [IBM headquarters in New York] and find seven patents you do infringe? Or do you want to make this easy and just pay us $20 million?" After a modest bit of negotiation, Sun cut IBM a check, and the blue suits went to the next company on their hit list. In corporate America, this type of shakedown is repeated weekly. The patent as stimulant to invention has long since given way to the patent as blunt instrument for establishing an innovation stranglehold. Sometimes the antagonist is a large corporation, short on revenue-generating products but long on royalty-generating patents. On other occasions, an opportunistic "entrepreneur" who only produces patent applications uses the system's overly broad and undisciplined patent grant to shake down a potential competitor. .......... Nah, praktek seperti ini yang merusak Pak.Jadi jangan berbangga hati dulu dengan banyaknya patent submission.Banggalah jika menjadi leading di market tapi jangan bangga dengan mengancam persh lain melalui patent. Carlos
