IMHO The point was - "look 186 customers at $50 per month on ONE sector
= 9.3 K in revenue per month from ONE sector on one tower".... and one
of the teaser emails had numbers something similar to that.... some
folks may have bought into that I guess... blindly without doing the
math ? Maybe, I suppose.
I wanted a 3.65 product that worked and had some decent power behind
it. Power seems to be there but these disconnecting UE's are a Pain in
the ass. Here's one of them. This is 8.3Km. Perfect LOS; clear on F3
from end to end. It is the only UE on this sector. Dead center of the
beam, and it disconnects randomly. Why?
Connection Time : _3_Hours_46_Minutes_25_Seconds
LTE Information
State: _Attached_
DL Frequency: _3655000_kHz UL Frequency: _3655000_kHz
Bandwidth: _10000_kHz RSRP0: _-95_dBm
RSRP1: _-94_dBm RSRQ: _-8_dB
CINR0: _23_dB CINR1: _26_dB
SINR0: _23_dB SINR1: _26_dB
TX Power: _1_dBm PCI: _373_
Cell ID: _95490_
Ian
On 04/08/2016 11:04 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
I know the company that the original Holly Grail email was showing -
they pretty much encompass me and their reputation for being stupidly,
ridiculously, atrociously over subbed, and installing ANYONE regardless
of the signal, is the best thing that ever happened to my company... so
you're not going to serve 186 UE's at 10 to 25Mbps each like the Power
Point slides show... the math isn't there.
I remember those slides.....I kept my mouth shut while they did their
presentation, but I commented to my colleagues afterwards about the fact
that their graph showed the BS at 100% airtime utilization for 16 hours
a day. I don't remember what they were trying to demonstrate with those
charts though.
_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
