Interesting Excuse... How does it explain these ?


Connection Time :       _10_Hours_29_Minutes_53_Seconds

LTE Information
State:  _Attached_      
        
DL Frequency:   _3665000_kHz    UL Frequency:   _3665000_kHz
Bandwidth:      _10000_kHz      RSRP0:  _-85_dBm
RSRP1:  _-85_dBm        RSRQ:   _-8_dB
CINR0:  _28_dB  CINR1:  _29_dB
SINR0:  _28_dB  SINR1:  _29_dB
TX Power:       _0_dBm  PCI:    _1_
Cell ID:        _92929_

Connection Time :       _29_Minutes_17_Seconds

LTE Information
State:  _Attached_      
        
DL Frequency:   _3690000_kHz    UL Frequency:   _3690000_kHz
Bandwidth:      _10000_kHz      RSRP0:  _-102_dBm
RSRP1:  _-100_dBm       RSRQ:   _-8_dB
CINR0:  _19_dB  CINR1:  _20_dB
SINR0:  _20_dB  SINR1:  _20_dB
TX Power:       _23_dBm         PCI:    _1_


Connection Time :       _8_Hours_0_Minutes_48_Seconds

LTE Information
State:  _Attached_      
        
DL Frequency:   _3665000_kHz    UL Frequency:   _3665000_kHz
Bandwidth:      _10000_kHz      RSRP0:  _-102_dBm
RSRP1:  _-100_dBm       RSRQ:   _-8_dB
CINR0:  _19_dB  CINR1:  _20_dB
SINR0:  _19_dB  SINR1:  _20_dB
TX Power:       _17_dBm         PCI:    _1_
Cell ID:        _92929_


On 04/08/2016 4:40 PM, Shayne Lebrun wrote:

It may or may not be odd, but it may be a reason why the unit is disconnecting.

*From:*[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
*Sent:* Thursday, August 4, 2016 12:28 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [Telrad] Wimax to LTE

Is it odd to have different interference on two different polarities?

    Why are your CINRs off so much?  CINR0 is 23, CINR1 is 26, which
    means that of the two antennas in the same UE, one is seeing half
    the signal of the other one.  Telrad says that a 3db difference is
    bad, and a more than 3db swing is horrible.

    *From:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ian Fraser
    *Sent:* Thursday, August 4, 2016 11:23 AM
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [Telrad] Wimax to LTE

    IMHO The point was - "look 186 customers at $50 per month on ONE
    sector = 9.3 K in revenue per month from ONE sector on one
    tower".... and one of the teaser emails had numbers something
    similar to that.... some folks may have bought into that I
    guess... blindly without doing the math ? Maybe, I suppose.

    I wanted a 3.65 product that worked and had some decent power
    behind it.  Power seems to be there but these disconnecting UE's
    are a Pain in the ass.  Here's one of them.  This is 8.3Km.
    Perfect LOS; clear on F3 from end to end.  It is the only UE on
    this sector.  Dead center of the beam, and it disconnects
    randomly.  Why?

    Connection Time :

        

    _3_Hours_46_Minutes_25_Seconds

    *LTE Information*

    State:

        

    _Attached_

        
        

    DL Frequency:

        

    _3655000_kHz

        

    UL Frequency:

        

    _3655000_kHz

    Bandwidth:

        

    _10000_kHz

        

    RSRP0:

        

    _-95_dBm

    RSRP1:

        

    _-94_dBm

        

    RSRQ:

        

    _-8_dB

    CINR0:

        

    _23_dB

        

    CINR1:

        

    _26_dB

    SINR0:

        

    _23_dB

        

    SINR1:

        

    _26_dB

    TX Power:

        

    _1_dBm

        

    PCI:

        

    _373_

    Cell ID:

        

    _95490_

        
        

    Ian



    On 04/08/2016 11:04 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:

            I know the company that the original Holly Grail email was showing -

            they pretty much encompass me and their reputation for being 
stupidly,

            ridiculously, atrociously over subbed, and installing ANYONE 
regardless

            of the signal, is the best thing that ever happened to my 
company... so

            you're not going to serve 186 UE's at 10 to 25Mbps each like the 
Power

            Point slides show... the math isn't there.

        I remember those slides.....I kept my mouth shut while they did their

        presentation, but I commented to my colleagues afterwards about the fact

        that their graph showed the BS at 100% airtime utilization for 16 hours

        a day.  I don't remember what they were trying to demonstrate with those

        charts though.

        _______________________________________________

        Telrad mailing list

        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

        http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad







    _______________________________________________

    Telrad mailing list

    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad



_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad

--
Ian Fraser
goZoom.ca Inc.
195 Libby's Rd. McNab-Braeside
K7S0E1
877(613) 622 0093 ext 21

_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad

Reply via email to