Nick Dewar has it. It is version: 01.01.02.098.001 On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 10:05:13 -0400, Ian Fraser wrote > I already lock the UE's to the Frequency. I never thought oflocking the PLMN. > What version is it and where did you get it ? > I really doubt that there is another 3.65 Telrad user out herebut I suppose > it's not impossible. > Ian > > On 05/08/2016 8:29 AM, J Portman wrote: > We experienced these random disconnects as well. > > Went to the customer site, hooked into the UE and waited (a fewhours) and lo > and behold, there was another Telrad operatortransmitting into our area with > a very weak signal. > > You could watch the UE attempting to connect to the otheroperators equipment. > Don't know why and Telrad never had abelievable explanation. > > Telrad UE will randomly attempt to migrate to any available BTSunless you are > using manual PLMN selection or manual frequencyselection. > > We have mitigated this by using manual PLMN selection or manualfrequency > selection at the UE. There is a special version of thefirmware that allows > this. > > Worse yet, the competition BTS was at -122 to -125db and oursignal was at > -95. Drove us nuts. > > I filed several reports of this with Telrad and eventually got afirmware that > allowed us to lock the UE to our network. > > End of those problems. > > Latest 6.6 release is the most stable of all. > > YMMV > > JP > > On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 11:22:35 -0400, Ian Fraserwrote > > IMHO The point was - "look 186 customers at $50 per monthon ONE sector = > > 9.3 K in revenue per month from ONE sector onone tower".... and one of the > > teaser emails had numberssomething similar to that.... some folks may have > > bought intothat I guess... blindly without doing the math ? Maybe, > > Isuppose. > > > > I wanted a 3.65 product that worked and had some decentpower behind it. > > Power seems to be there but thesedisconnecting UE's are a Pain in the ass. > > Here's one of them. This is 8.3Km. Perfect LOS; clear on F3 from end to > > end. It isthe only UE on this sector. Dead center of the beam, and > > itdisconnects randomly. Why? > >
Connection Time : 3 Hours 46 Minutes 25 Seconds > > LTE Information State: Attached > > > > DL Frequency: 3655000 kHz UL Frequency: 3655000 kHz Bandwidth: 10000 kHz RSRP0: -95 dBm RSRP1: -94 dBm RSRQ: -8 dB CINR0: 23 dB CINR1: 26 dB SINR0: 23 dB SINR1: 26 dB TX Power: 1 dBm PCI: 373 Cell ID: 95490 > > > > Ian > > > > On 04/08/2016 11:04 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: > > I know the company that the original Holly Grail email was showing - they pretty much encompass me and their reputation for being stupidly, ridiculously, atrociously over subbed, and installing ANYONE regardless of the signal, is the best thing that ever happened to my company... so you're not going to serve 186 UE's at 10 to 25Mbps each like the Power Point slides show... the math isn't there. I remember those slides.....I kept my mouth shut while they did their presentation, but I commented to my colleagues afterwards about the fact that their graph showed the BS at 100% airtime utilization for 16 hours a day. I don't remember what they were trying to demonstrate with those charts though. _______________________________________________ Telrad mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > Joe Portman Alamo Broadband Inc. www.alamobroadband.com _______________________________________________ Telrad mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad >-- Ian Fraser goZoom.ca Inc. 195 Libby's Rd. McNab-Braeside K7S0E1 877(613) 622 0093 ext 21 Joe Portman Alamo Broadband Inc. www.alamobroadband.com
_______________________________________________ Telrad mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
