We experienced these random disconnects as well.

Went to the customer site, hooked into the UE and waited (a few hours) and lo 
and behold, there was another Telrad operator transmitting into our area with a 
very weak signal.

You could watch the UE attempting to connect to the other operators equipment. 
Don't know why and Telrad never had a believable explanation.

Telrad UE will randomly attempt to migrate to any available BTS unless you are 
using manual PLMN selection or manual frequency selection.

We have mitigated this by using manual PLMN selection or manual frequency 
selection at the UE. There is a special version of the firmware that allows 
this.

Worse yet, the competition BTS was at -122 to -125db and our signal was at -95. 
Drove us nuts.

I filed several reports of this with Telrad and eventually got a firmware that 
allowed us to lock the UE to our network.

End of those problems.

Latest 6.6 release is the most stable of all.

YMMV

JP

On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 11:22:35 -0400, Ian Fraser wrote
> IMHO The point was - "look 186 customers at $50 per month on ONEsector = 9.3 
> K in revenue per month from ONE sector on onetower".... and one of the teaser 
> emails had numbers somethingsimilar to that.... some folks may have bought 
> into that Iguess... blindly without doing the math ? Maybe, I suppose. 
> 
> I wanted a 3.65 product that worked and had some decent powerbehind it.  
> Power seems to be there but these disconnecting UE'sare a Pain in the ass.  
> Here's one of them.  This is 8.3Km.Perfect LOS; clear on F3 from end to end.  
> It is the only UE onthis sector.  Dead center of the beam, and it 
> disconnectsrandomly.  Why?
>

 ConnectionTime :  3 Hours 46 Minutes 25 Seconds

> LTEInformation

 State:  Attached  
>  
> 
 DLFrequency:  3655000 kHz  ULFrequency:  3655000 kHz 
 Bandwidth:  10000 kHz  RSRP0:  -95 dBm 
 RSRP1:  -94 dBm  RSRQ:  -8 dB 
 CINR0:  23 dB  CINR1:  26 dB 
 SINR0:  23 dB  SINR1:  26 dB 
 TXPower:  1 dBm  PCI:  373 
 CellID:  95490

> 
> Ian
> 
> On 04/08/2016 11:04 AM, Adam Moffettwrote:
>

I know the company that the original Holly Grail email was 
showing 
-
they pretty much encompass me and their reputation for being 
stupidly,
ridiculously, atrociously over subbed, and installing ANYONE 
regardless
of the signal, is the best thing that ever happened to my company... 
so
you're not going to serve 186 UE's at 10 to 25Mbps each like the 
Power
Point slides show... the math isn't 
there.
I remember those slides.....I kept my mouth shut while they did their

presentation, but I commented to my colleagues afterwards about the fact

that their graph showed the BS at 100% airtime utilization for 16 hours

a day. I don't remember what they were trying to demonstrate with those

charts 
though.

_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing 
list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad

>

Joe Portman 
Alamo Broadband Inc. 
www.alamobroadband.com
 
_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad

Reply via email to