Correct. Iperf tests show good results and so does dslreports speedtest with a bunch of streams open it yields great results. Like I said it does not cause actual performance issues just lack of performance on sites like speedtest.net. Trying to explain that to customers who don't understand and do not have service issues just that their speedtest results are not showing what they are paying for. Even though they can stream 3 movies at one time. We have close to 600 UE's online now and very rarely get calls from our LTE customers. I was just curious if anybody else had experienced or had a solution for the difference in site vs remote eNB's.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Matthew Carpenter < [email protected]> wrote: > Are two EPC are located at the Datacenter. > None of our eNB are located in the same location as the Datacenter. > > I mostly use iperf from the UE back to the Datacenter for a good > speedtest. I know customers use speedtest.net (we have a speedtest.net > service > in our Datacenter also). > Results between iperf and speedtest.net are very close to the same. > > I have neve taken a EPC out to the tower where a eNB is located. > > Packages we sell on LTE are 5,10,15,20. Most are on the 10 or 15 Mbit > plan. > Upload is 1 or 2 mbit and most are on the 1 Mbit. > > So you are saying that the S1 tunnel between the EPC and eNB could be > causing an issue? I have not really seen any speed problems until we got > to around 25-30UE’s on a eNB, at that point I have been unable to get the > upload speeds. > You would think on a 80x10 plan (for us only to test with), and the eNB > only moving small amount of data I should be able to 60x7, but I only see > around 14Mbit x 600K. > > Matt Carpenter > > > > On Nov 16, 2016, at 10:13 PM, Skywerx Support <[email protected]> > wrote: > > What about on say for example speedtest.net with a UE connected to and > eNB where the EPC is located vs a UE connected to an eNB that is not. We > are putting 80 UE's on our eNB's with no problem. Performance is always > there but we do see a difference with web based speedtests when the eNB's > are not at the EPC site. > > -- > Justin Davis > COO > SkyWerx Industries, LLC > > On Nov 16, 2016, at 9:06 PM, Matthew Carpenter < > [email protected]> wrote: > > We have a new eNB with only 3 UE’s on it, speed tests (iperf) this evening > are 63x7.5 4x4TM4 Mode and 2/0 frame config. > > If I run a iperf on a UE connected to a eNB with 40+ UE’s then I find the > download is in the 14-18Mbit range, but the upload is 300-600K. > Checking the eNB in Breezeview it shows very little usage at the time I > tested. > > I need to check all eNB if see if they exhibit this same upload speed > issues. From little rumblings in the Service Dept I think I will find they > all do this. > > Nick is working on this and I am sure he will come up with a solution soon. > > Matt Carpenter > > > > > > On Nov 16, 2016, at 8:58 PM, Skywerx Support <[email protected]> > wrote: > > We have two 2020 centralized also with 8 eNB talking to one and 7 eNB to > the other. Are you seeing similar throughout on all eNB's that are not > located where the EPC's are? > > -- > Justin Davis > COO > SkyWerx Industries, LLC > > On Nov 16, 2016, at 7:28 PM, Matthew Carpenter < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Two Centralized EPCs. > > Right now they are 1010RPL (2020L), but we are software upgrading them to > the 2020CS this week. > > Matt Carpenter > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Skywerx Support < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Matt, >> >> Are you using site based or centralized EPC? >> >> Thanks >> >> -- >> Justin Davis >> COO >> SkyWerx Industries, LLC >> >> On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Matthew Carpenter < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> From what I have seen running 4573: >> >> 1. 4x4TM4 is working good. I have 2 eNB’s using it with good speeds >> through trees. In one location I saw 63Mbit x 7.3Mbit and a CINR of 27. >> UBNT 5ghz at this same location was around 79db and we would not install. >> 2. Better performance. Jury is still out on this one. Like a few of you >> have stated the Upload speeds are not where they should be 2/0 config and >> only 1mbit of upload and I only see 700-800K on iperf test. >> 3. There are some timer changes that extend the amount of time a action >> happens. >> >> Stable, with 7000 and 8000’s both working good, except for the speed >> issues that I stated above. >> Telrad support is working on them now. >> >> Matt Carpenter >> Amarillo Wireless >> >> >> >> On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Ian Fraser <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> No release notes that I find (?) So what's the benefit ? >> >> -- >> >> Ian FrasergoZoom.ca <http://gozoom.ca/> Inc. >> 195 Libby's Rd. McNab-Braeside >> K7S0E1 >> 877(613) 622 0093 ext 21 >> >> >> On 16/11/2016 4:39 PM, Jeremy Austin wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Ian Fraser <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> I'm still on 4013. Has 4573 fixed anything for anyone ? Like the >>> high upload utilization ? I'm using sf2/ssf0. Changing subframe is not an >>> option for me - I need to co-exist with a another provider who will never >>> change. >>> >> >> 4573 seems fairly stable for us with 7ks running .105 and 8ks. Didn't fix >> the upload KPI or (as far as we can tell) performance. >> >> >> -- >> Jeremy Austin >> >> (907) 895-2311 >> (907) 803-5422 >> [email protected] >> >> Heritage NetWorks >> Whitestone Power & Communications >> Vertical Broadband, LLC >> >> Schedule a meeting: http://doodle.com/jermudgeon >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Telrad mailing [email protected] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Telrad mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Telrad mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Telrad mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad >> >> > > > -- > *Matthew Carpenter* > *806-316-5071 <806-316-5071> office* > *806-236-9558 <806-236-9558> cell* > > > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > > > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > -- Sincerely, Justin Davis SkyWerx COO 970-731-9790
_______________________________________________ Telrad mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
