We have two 2020 centralized also with 8 eNB talking to one and 7 eNB to the 
other.  Are you seeing similar throughout on all eNB's that are not located 
where the EPC's are?

--
Justin Davis
COO
SkyWerx Industries, LLC

> On Nov 16, 2016, at 7:28 PM, Matthew Carpenter 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Two Centralized EPCs.
> 
> Right now they are 1010RPL (2020L), but we are software upgrading them to the 
> 2020CS this week.  
> 
> Matt Carpenter
> 
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Skywerx Support <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> Matt,
>> 
>> Are you using site based or centralized EPC?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> --
>> Justin Davis
>> COO
>> SkyWerx Industries, LLC
>> 
>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Matthew Carpenter 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> From what I have seen running 4573:
>>> 
>>> 1. 4x4TM4 is working good.  I have 2 eNB’s using it with good speeds 
>>> through trees. In one location I saw 63Mbit x 7.3Mbit and a CINR of 27.  
>>> UBNT 5ghz at this same location was around 79db and we would not install.
>>> 2. Better performance.  Jury is still out on this one.  Like a few of you 
>>> have stated the Upload speeds are not where they should be 2/0 config and 
>>> only 1mbit of upload and I only see 700-800K on iperf test.
>>> 3. There are some timer changes that extend the amount of time a action 
>>> happens.  
>>> 
>>> Stable, with 7000 and 8000’s both working good, except for the speed issues 
>>> that I stated above.  
>>> Telrad support is working on them now.
>>> 
>>> Matt Carpenter
>>> Amarillo Wireless
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Ian Fraser <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> No release notes that I find (?)    So what's the benefit ? 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Ian Fraser
>>>> goZoom.ca Inc.
>>>> 195 Libby's Rd. McNab-Braeside
>>>> K7S0E1
>>>> 877(613) 622 0093 ext 21
>>>> 
>>>>> On 16/11/2016 4:39 PM, Jeremy Austin wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Ian Fraser <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm still on 4013.   Has 4573 fixed anything for anyone ?  Like the high 
>>>>>> upload utilization ?  I'm using sf2/ssf0.  Changing subframe is not an 
>>>>>> option for me - I need to co-exist with a another provider who will 
>>>>>> never change.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 4573 seems fairly stable for us with 7ks running .105 and 8ks. Didn't fix 
>>>>> the upload KPI or (as far as we can tell) performance. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Jeremy Austin
>>>>> 
>>>>> (907) 895-2311
>>>>> (907) 803-5422
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> Heritage NetWorks
>>>>> Whitestone Power & Communications
>>>>> Vertical Broadband, LLC
>>>>> 
>>>>> Schedule a meeting: http://doodle.com/jermudgeon
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Telrad mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Telrad mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Telrad mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Telrad mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matthew Carpenter
> 806-316-5071 office
> 806-236-9558 cell
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Telrad mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad

Reply via email to