What about on say for example speedtest.net with a UE connected to and eNB where the EPC is located vs a UE connected to an eNB that is not. We are putting 80 UE's on our eNB's with no problem. Performance is always there but we do see a difference with web based speedtests when the eNB's are not at the EPC site.
-- Justin Davis COO SkyWerx Industries, LLC > On Nov 16, 2016, at 9:06 PM, Matthew Carpenter > <[email protected]> wrote: > > We have a new eNB with only 3 UE’s on it, speed tests (iperf) this evening > are 63x7.5 4x4TM4 Mode and 2/0 frame config. > > If I run a iperf on a UE connected to a eNB with 40+ UE’s then I find the > download is in the 14-18Mbit range, but the upload is 300-600K. > Checking the eNB in Breezeview it shows very little usage at the time I > tested. > > I need to check all eNB if see if they exhibit this same upload speed issues. > From little rumblings in the Service Dept I think I will find they all do > this. > > Nick is working on this and I am sure he will come up with a solution soon. > > Matt Carpenter > > > > > >> On Nov 16, 2016, at 8:58 PM, Skywerx Support <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> We have two 2020 centralized also with 8 eNB talking to one and 7 eNB to the >> other. Are you seeing similar throughout on all eNB's that are not located >> where the EPC's are? >> >> -- >> Justin Davis >> COO >> SkyWerx Industries, LLC >> >>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 7:28 PM, Matthew Carpenter >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Two Centralized EPCs. >>> >>> Right now they are 1010RPL (2020L), but we are software upgrading them to >>> the 2020CS this week. >>> >>> Matt Carpenter >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Skywerx Support >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Matt, >>>> >>>> Are you using site based or centralized EPC? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Justin Davis >>>> COO >>>> SkyWerx Industries, LLC >>>> >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Matthew Carpenter >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> From what I have seen running 4573: >>>>> >>>>> 1. 4x4TM4 is working good. I have 2 eNB’s using it with good speeds >>>>> through trees. In one location I saw 63Mbit x 7.3Mbit and a CINR of 27. >>>>> UBNT 5ghz at this same location was around 79db and we would not install. >>>>> 2. Better performance. Jury is still out on this one. Like a few of you >>>>> have stated the Upload speeds are not where they should be 2/0 config and >>>>> only 1mbit of upload and I only see 700-800K on iperf test. >>>>> 3. There are some timer changes that extend the amount of time a action >>>>> happens. >>>>> >>>>> Stable, with 7000 and 8000’s both working good, except for the speed >>>>> issues that I stated above. >>>>> Telrad support is working on them now. >>>>> >>>>> Matt Carpenter >>>>> Amarillo Wireless >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Ian Fraser <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> No release notes that I find (?) So what's the benefit ? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ian Fraser >>>>>> goZoom.ca Inc. >>>>>> 195 Libby's Rd. McNab-Braeside >>>>>> K7S0E1 >>>>>> 877(613) 622 0093 ext 21 >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 16/11/2016 4:39 PM, Jeremy Austin wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Ian Fraser <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm still on 4013. Has 4573 fixed anything for anyone ? Like the >>>>>>>> high upload utilization ? I'm using sf2/ssf0. Changing subframe is >>>>>>>> not an option for me - I need to co-exist with a another provider who >>>>>>>> will never change. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 4573 seems fairly stable for us with 7ks running .105 and 8ks. Didn't >>>>>>> fix the upload KPI or (as far as we can tell) performance. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Jeremy Austin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (907) 895-2311 >>>>>>> (907) 803-5422 >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Heritage NetWorks >>>>>>> Whitestone Power & Communications >>>>>>> Vertical Broadband, LLC >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Schedule a meeting: http://doodle.com/jermudgeon >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Telrad mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Telrad mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Telrad mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Telrad mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthew Carpenter >>> 806-316-5071 office >>> 806-236-9558 cell >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Telrad mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad >> _______________________________________________ >> Telrad mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
_______________________________________________ Telrad mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
