Are two EPC are located at the Datacenter. 
None of our eNB are located in the same location as the Datacenter.

I mostly use iperf from the UE back to the Datacenter for a good speedtest.  I 
know customers use speedtest.net <http://speedtest.net/> (we have a 
speedtest.net <http://speedtest.net/> service in our Datacenter also).
Results between iperf and speedtest.net <http://speedtest.net/> are very close 
to the same.

I have neve taken a EPC out to the tower where a eNB is located.

Packages we sell on LTE are 5,10,15,20.  Most are on the 10 or 15 Mbit plan.
Upload is 1 or 2 mbit and most are on the 1 Mbit.

So you are saying that the S1 tunnel between the EPC and eNB could be causing 
an issue?  I have not really seen any speed problems until we got to around 
25-30UE’s on a eNB, at that point I have been unable to get the upload speeds.
You would think on a 80x10 plan (for us only to test with), and the eNB only 
moving small amount of data I should be able to 60x7, but I only see around 
14Mbit x 600K.

Matt Carpenter



> On Nov 16, 2016, at 10:13 PM, Skywerx Support <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> What about on say for example speedtest.net <http://speedtest.net/> with a UE 
> connected to and eNB where the EPC is located vs a UE connected to an eNB 
> that is not.   We are putting 80 UE's on our eNB's with no problem.  
> Performance is always there but we do see a difference with web based 
> speedtests when the eNB's are not at the EPC site.
> 
> --
> Justin Davis
> COO
> SkyWerx Industries, LLC
> 
> On Nov 16, 2016, at 9:06 PM, Matthew Carpenter 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
> wrote:
> 
>> We have a new eNB with only 3 UE’s on it, speed tests (iperf) this evening 
>> are 63x7.5  4x4TM4 Mode and 2/0 frame config.
>> 
>> If I run a iperf on a UE connected to a eNB with 40+ UE’s then I find the 
>> download is in the 14-18Mbit range, but the upload is 300-600K.
>> Checking the eNB in Breezeview it shows very little usage at the time I 
>> tested.
>> 
>> I need to check all eNB if see if they exhibit this same upload speed 
>> issues.  From little rumblings in the Service Dept I think I will find they 
>> all do this.
>> 
>> Nick is working on this and I am sure he will come up with a solution soon.
>> 
>> Matt Carpenter
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 8:58 PM, Skywerx Support <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We have two 2020 centralized also with 8 eNB talking to one and 7 eNB to 
>>> the other.  Are you seeing similar throughout on all eNB's that are not 
>>> located where the EPC's are?
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Justin Davis
>>> COO
>>> SkyWerx Industries, LLC
>>> 
>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 7:28 PM, Matthew Carpenter 
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Two Centralized EPCs.
>>>> 
>>>> Right now they are 1010RPL (2020L), but we are software upgrading them to 
>>>> the 2020CS this week.  
>>>> 
>>>> Matt Carpenter
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Skywerx Support 
>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> Matt,
>>>> 
>>>> Are you using site based or centralized EPC?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Justin Davis
>>>> COO
>>>> SkyWerx Industries, LLC
>>>> 
>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Matthew Carpenter 
>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> From what I have seen running 4573:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1. 4x4TM4 is working good.  I have 2 eNB’s using it with good speeds 
>>>>> through trees. In one location I saw 63Mbit x 7.3Mbit and a CINR of 27.  
>>>>> UBNT 5ghz at this same location was around 79db and we would not install.
>>>>> 2. Better performance.  Jury is still out on this one.  Like a few of you 
>>>>> have stated the Upload speeds are not where they should be 2/0 config and 
>>>>> only 1mbit of upload and I only see 700-800K on iperf test.
>>>>> 3. There are some timer changes that extend the amount of time a action 
>>>>> happens.  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Stable, with 7000 and 8000’s both working good, except for the speed 
>>>>> issues that I stated above.  
>>>>> Telrad support is working on them now.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Matt Carpenter
>>>>> Amarillo Wireless
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Ian Fraser <[email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> No release notes that I find (?)    So what's the benefit ? 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ian Fraser
>>>>>> goZoom.ca <http://gozoom.ca/> Inc.
>>>>>> 195 Libby's Rd. McNab-Braeside
>>>>>> K7S0E1
>>>>>> 877(613) 622 0093 ext 21 <tel:%28613%29%20622%200093%20ext%2021>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 16/11/2016 4:39 PM, Jeremy Austin wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Ian Fraser <[email protected] 
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm still on 4013.   Has 4573 fixed anything for anyone ?  Like the 
>>>>>>> high upload utilization ?  I'm using sf2/ssf0.  Changing subframe is 
>>>>>>> not an option for me - I need to co-exist with a another provider who 
>>>>>>> will never change.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 4573 seems fairly stable for us with 7ks running .105 and 8ks. Didn't 
>>>>>>> fix the upload KPI or (as far as we can tell) performance. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Jeremy Austin
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> (907) 895-2311
>>>>>>> (907) 803-5422 <tel:%28907%29%20803-5422>
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Heritage NetWorks
>>>>>>> Whitestone Power & Communications
>>>>>>> Vertical Broadband, LLC
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Schedule a meeting: http://doodle.com/jermudgeon 
>>>>>>> <http://doodle.com/jermudgeon>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Telrad mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Telrad mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad 
>>>>>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad>
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Telrad mailing list
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad 
>>>>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad>
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Telrad mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad 
>>>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Matthew Carpenter
>>>> 806-316-5071 office
>>>> 806-236-9558 cell
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Telrad mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad 
>>>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Telrad mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad 
>>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Telrad mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad 
>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad>
> _______________________________________________
> Telrad mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad

_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad

Reply via email to