Thanks Andreas! What is the max cell radius for 1/3 and how much of a difference are you seeing in upload?
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Andreas Wiatowski <[email protected] > wrote: > We used to run 1/1 and switched to 1/3 … take a small hit on download for > the better upload. > > > > Cheers, > > ______________________________ > > Andreas Wiatowski | CEO > > Silo Wireless Inc. > > Email [email protected] > > 19 Sage Court > > Brantford, Ontario N3R 7T4 (CANADA) > > Tel +1.519.449.5656 Extension-600|Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free > +1.866.727.4138 > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *J Portman > *Sent:* Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:22 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Telrad] Issues > > > > We use 2/2 subframe/special subframe. Limits us to 10 miles but _much_ > better performance overall than 2/0. > > YMMV. > > JP > *On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:43:07 -0600, Matthew Carpenter wrote* > > From what I have seen running 4573: > > > > > 1. 4x4TM4 is working good. I have 2 [UTF-8?]eNB’s using it with good > speeds through trees. In one location I saw 63Mbit x 7.3Mbit and a CINR of > 27. UBNT 5ghz at this same location was around 79db and we would not > install. > > 2. Better performance. Jury is still out on this one. Like a few of > you have stated the Upload speeds are not where they should be 2/0 config > and only 1mbit of upload and I only see 700-800K on iperf test. > > 3. There are some timer changes that extend the amount of time a action > happens. > > > > > Stable, with 7000 and [UTF-8?]8000’s both working good, except for the > speed issues that I stated above. > > Telrad support is working on them now. > > > > > Matt Carpenter > > Amarillo Wireless > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Ian Fraser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > No release notes that I find (?) So what's the benefit ? > > > > -- > > Ian > > Fraser > > goZoom.ca <http://gozoom.ca/> > > Inc. > > 195 Libby's Rd. > > McNab-Braeside > > K7S0E1 > > 877(613) 622 0093 ext > > 21 > > > > > On 16/11/2016 4:39 PM, Jeremy Austin wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Ian Fraser <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > I'm still on 4013. Has 4573 fixed anything for anyone ? Like the > high upload utilization ? I'm using sf2/ssf0. Changing subframe is not an > option for me - I need to co-exist with a another provider who will never > change. > > > 4573 seems fairly stable for us with 7ks running .105 and 8ks. Didn't fix > the upload KPI or (as far as we can tell) performance. > > > > > -- > > > > > Jeremy Austin > > > > > (907) 895-2311 > > (907) 803-5422 > > [email protected] > > > > > > > Heritage NetWorks > > Whitestone Power & Communications > > Vertical Broadband, LLC > > > > > Schedule a meeting: http://doodle.com/jermudgeon > > > _______________________________________________ > > Telrad mailing > > list > > [email protected] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > > > > > Joe Portman > Alamo Broadband Inc. > www.alamobroadband.com > > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > > -- Sincerely, Justin Davis SkyWerx COO 970-731-9790
_______________________________________________ Telrad mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
