I might be thinking backwards....I thought higher Special Subframe gave
you more DL and shorter range.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Andreas Wiatowski" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: 11/17/2016 3:53:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Issues
We used to run 1/1 and switched to 1/3 … take a small hit on download
for the better upload.
Cheers,
______________________________
Andreas Wiatowski | CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
Email [email protected]
19 Sage Court
Brantford, Ontario N3R 7T4 (CANADA)
Tel +1.519.449.5656 Extension-600|Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free
+1.866.727.4138
From:[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of J Portman
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:22 AM
To:[email protected]
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Issues
We use 2/2 subframe/special subframe. Limits us to 10 miles but _much_
better performance overall than 2/0.
YMMV.
JP
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:43:07 -0600, Matthew Carpenter wrote
> From what I have seen running 4573:
>
> 1. 4x4TM4 is working good. I have 2 [UTF-8?]eNB’s using it with
good speeds through trees. In one location I saw 63Mbit x 7.3Mbit and a
CINR of 27. UBNT 5ghz at this same location was around 79db and we
would not install.
> 2. Better performance. Jury is still out on this one. Like a few of
you have stated the Upload speeds are not where they should be 2/0
config and only 1mbit of upload and I only see 700-800K on iperf test.
> 3. There are some timer changes that extend the amount of time a
action happens.
>
> Stable, with 7000 and [UTF-8?]8000’s both working good, except for
the speed issues that I stated above.
> Telrad support is working on them now.
>
> Matt Carpenter
> Amarillo Wireless
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Ian Fraser <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>
> No release notes that I find (?) So what's the benefit ?
>
--
Ian
Fraser
goZoom.ca
Inc.
195 Libby's Rd.
McNab-Braeside
K7S0E1
877(613) 622 0093 ext
21
> On 16/11/2016 4:39 PM, Jeremy Austin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Ian Fraser <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> I'm still on 4013. Has 4573 fixed anything for anyone ? Like
the high upload utilization ? I'm using sf2/ssf0. Changing
subframe is not an option for me - I need to co-exist with a another
provider who will never change.
4573 seems fairly stable for us with 7ks running .105 and 8ks. Didn't
fix the upload KPI or (as far as we can tell) performance.
>
--
>
> Jeremy Austin
>
> (907) 895-2311
> (907) 803-5422
> [email protected]
>
>
> Heritage NetWorks
> Whitestone Power & Communications
> Vertical Broadband, LLC
>
> Schedule a meeting: http://doodle.com/jermudgeon
_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing
list
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
Joe Portman
Alamo Broadband Inc.
http://www.alamobroadband.com/
_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
