The 4x4 uses TM4 (Transmit Mode 4)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiNYEQKXAAk

Part of this is the reflections through trees, if you don't have NLOS
(Trees) then you lose the reflections and therefore speed.

I have shutoff 4x4TM4 on all sites. I have one site with a mix of LOS and
NLOS and really would like 4x4TM4 on, but I saw a large decrease in
performance.    UE's there were NLOS had better SINR/CINR and
therefore better speeds.

Matt Carpenter
Amarillo Wireless





On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]>
wrote:

> In drive testing we had best overall throughput with 2x4, so we came out
> of the gate with 2x4 everywhere.
>
> 4x4 was only circumstantially helpful, and often made throughput worse.
> That's what tech support advised me, and our testing seemed to confirm it.
>
>
> Interesting if confusing.  Doesn't make sense to me that this is only
> usable if ALL CPE are NLOS.  What if you have a handful of NLOS CPE you
> want to improve performance of?  You can't do that without negatively
> impacting the performance of LOS ones?  Sounds like a feature with very
> limited usefulness.
>
>
>
> Are your experiences with 2x4 good and do you find that it helps?
>
>
>
> -- Nathan
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 31, 2016 9:19 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Telrad] More CPE8K woes
>
>
>
> I was advised not use 4x4 unless all the CPE were NLOS.  The explanation I
> was given was that in 4x4's current form the CPE will have difficulty
> differentiating between all 4 chains.
>
> In our drive testing we found 4x4 performed worse than 2x2 in most cases,
> but it was better for weak/NLOS CPE, which jives with what I was told.  Try
> 2x4 as a middle ground.  I also believe I was told that 4x4 is going to
> work better when MU-MIMO hits the street.
>
> -Adam
>
> So, an update on this for those who are interested:
>
>
>
> VERY preliminary results so far, and I'm not even sure I am willing to
> hang my hat on them yet they are so "late-breaking", but:
>
>
>
> - Upgrading Compacts on 6.5r1 to 6.6 *seems* to have largely mitigated
> this issue for CPE8Ks attached to such Compacts.
>
> - CPE8Ks attached to Compacts already running 6.6 that exchibited similar
> symptoms *seem* to be fixed...after turning 4x4TM4 off on the Compact. :-(
>
>
>
> The CPE8Ks on the 6.6 Compacts in 4x4 mode showed other weirdness in
> addition to the constant detaches, such as extremely low downlink
> throughput (CPE7Ks on the same Compact continued to perform just fine).
> Once 4x4 was disabled, throughput issue cleared right up, as did the CPE
> detaches.
>
>
>
> grrr.
>
>
>
> So I guess we continue to run without 4x4.
>
>
>
> It wasn't like we seemed to be getting much benefit from it anyway.  We
> didn't see the SINRs budge at all on any of the CPEs.  Maybe we are doing
> something wrong?  The only thing I did to enable it was 'set deployment
> topology SingleCarrier4X4TM4', commit, and reboot.
>
>
>
> -- Nathan
>
>
>
> *From:* Nathan Anderson
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 21, 2016 3:27 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [Telrad] More CPE8K woes
>
>
>
> To be more precise, I should say that a CPE8K that didn't have the problem
> suddenly started experiencing it, and this coincided with the firmware
> upgrade of the eNB he attaches to.  I can't definitively say that the eNB
> upgrade actually caused it.  It's just an interesting data point that we
> definitely have CPE8Ks experiencing this issue across multiple eNB firmware
> versions.
>
>
>
> -- Nathan
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Nathan Anderson
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 21, 2016 3:23 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Telrad] More CPE8K woes
>
>
>
> EPC is 6.6 0729
>
>
>
> We admittedly still have some ENB 6.5r1 (2616) running out there; when 6.6
> came out, it wasn't soon after (2-3 months maybe?) we had managed to stop
> banging our heads into our desks trying to get everything to run smoothly
> and with good performance.  We saw some reports of troubles with 6.6
> shortly after release, esp. with 4x4 mode, which we didn't have to use if
> we upgraded, true, but it was one of the major draws of the release, so if
> we were going to hold off on implementing that, why rush to upgrade?  It
> was nice to be able to have things run smoothly for a time and sit back and
> take a breath.
>
>
>
> But 6.5 ENB code doesn't seem to be to blame here; in fact, last night, I
> pushed 6.6 out to one ENB, which caused a CPE8K that previously was not
> exhibiting these symptoms to suddenly begin doing so today!
>
>
>
> -- Nathan
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]
> <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy Austin
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 21, 2016 3:12 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Telrad] More CPE8K woes
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Nathan Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Is anybody else out there seeing their CPE8000s randomly drop off the
> network
>
>
> I only saw this on a 1xxx revision of EPC code, and it might have not been
> the same precise behavior. What ENB/EPC code are you running?
>
>
>
> --
>
> Jeremy Austin
>
>
>
> (907) 895-2311
>
> (907) 803-5422
>
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> Heritage NetWorks
>
> Whitestone Power & Communications
>
> Vertical Broadband, LLC
>
>
>
> Schedule a meeting: http://doodle.com/jermudgeon
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Telrad mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Telrad mailing 
> [email protected]http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Telrad mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
>
>


-- 
*Matthew Carpenter*
*806-316-5071 office*
*806-236-9558 cell*
_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad

Reply via email to