Eric.Saxe wrote: > Li, Aubrey wrote: >> Rafael.Vanoni wrote: >> >> >>> Comments from the bug report >>> >>> >>>> Comment #3 From Aubrey.Li 2009-04-14 23:41:27 ------- >>>> >>>> I attached a patch. >>>> >>>> Changelog: >>>> >>>> 1) change g_msg_idle_state, the current string is too long, >>>> for the alignment issue, the string "(idle power states" was >>>> removed. >>>> >>> How about just (idle states) ? I know it's a nit, but new users >>> have no idea what a C-state is. >>> >>> >> >> I'm still suggesting C-state, :) >> > My 2c: I think having C-state there is ok (provided the right thing > happens on non-x86 systems)...but having something in "()" > after (a word > or two) which tells users these are power states for idle CPUs makes > sense to me. The trick is coming up with something short and > descriptive... > > How about: "C-states (Idle power)"? > > -Eric
"C-states (Idle power)" has no alignment issue and good to me. Thanks, -Aubrey
