What are the thoughts on integrating a c-state kstat into Nevada? We do not currently support c-states and may never support c-states on some platforms. Would it cause user confusion if we report an unsupported feature?
Bill Darrin Johnson wrote: > I would save shelve the issue until ktstat c-state info is there. The > whitespace is fine for now. > > Darrin > > Aubrey Li wrote: > >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Rafael Vanoni <Rafael.Vanoni at sun.com> >> wrote: >> >>> But we're still only reporting C-states that the processor transitions to. >>> If the system supports Cn, we only report it's existence after the first >>> transition to it. If this is the desired behavior, we gotta update the >>> manual. >>> >>> >> well, you're right, this may not the desired behavior but it's the current >> behavior. So i guess as for window position, if we need to fix this bug >> right now, this is the best way so far. >> We can change this after kstat c-state info get supported. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Thanks, >> -Aubrey >> _______________________________________________ >> tesla-dev mailing list >> tesla-dev at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/tesla-dev >> > >
