On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Don Simons wrote:
>
> t
> .\
> Abepl
> g04 t | g t t+.5+.5 | g t+.5-.5 t | g t t /
> g04 t t | g t t+1+1 | g t+1-1 t | g t t /
> g04 t t | g t t | g t t+2+2 | g t+2-2 t /
> g04 t t | g t t | g t t | g t t /
> g04 t t | g t t | g t t | g t /
> ===================================================
>
> Maybe I don't understand the problem. It appears to me that the limit on tie
> adjustments occurs only with bitmapped slurs/ties, but not postscript. Are
> you using bitmapped slurs/ties? If so, why not use postscript?
Dear Don:
thank you for the solution. I learned two things I did not know: first,
that you can use several t one after another and, secondly, that adjustement
is possible with the Kneifl slurs. I am not an editor of music. Nearly all of
my typesetting is done for quick arrangements not to be published,
with a minimum of cosmetic efforts. Under standard conditions, the postscript
slurs and ties are too much curved for my crowded scores. Of course, that
can be adjusted, but usually I simply compare the slurs of the drafts and take
what suits me best.
Thanks again,
Christof
_______________________________________________
TeX-music mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
