Dieter, good luck with your development work, and I’ll be watching for an
alpha-test version.

 

Meanwhile I have found a good, free way to view musicxml files in Windows:
Finale Notepad 2012. They do ask for some personal info before letting you
download it, but once installed, I got it to provide screen images of a
musicxml file, and I could print it out, either to  a hard copy or a pdf
using acrobat.

 

As for sample files, I found some on http://musescore.com/sheetmusic. I put
“*.xml” in the search line but I’m not sure I even had to do that…maybe
everything there is available as a *mxl file. 

 

Curious sidelight: When googling for free musicxml downloads, I found the
page http://www.musicxml.com/music-in-musicxml/ . It lists not only
musescore.com but also IMSLP (!) and WIMA (!!) as sources of free musicxml
files. Short of random searching, I can’t imagine how to find any such files
on either of those sites.

 

--Don Simons

From: TeX-Music [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dieter
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 5:44 AM
To: Werner Icking Music Archive
Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Scanner Input for PMX

 

Don--

thank you for your encouragement. So far I scratched only the surface of
MusicXML, i.e. the basic notes properties. Now I am trying to decode a piano
setting with two voices in each stave.
When that works, then I have to think about how to distribute it. Maybe I am
a bit in a Cul de Sac with my 20 year old Oberon implementation. But I could
not do the development in any other language. The language is simple, but
most powerful and the environment is extremely responsive.
We have several options.  I am not totally convinced, that I will get to a
point where I can distribute an executable. Therefore I will have to
distribute source code. I will be checking the follower systems at Zürich.
Another option would be to rewrite my logic in LUA. But there I do not have
any practice.

Meanwhile it would be useful (as you say) to have other sources of MusicXML
than Scanner + SharpEye. So anybody who can provide MusicXML-sources will be
most welcome.

--Dieter

Am 07.11.2014 00:32, schrieb Don Simons:

Dieter—

 

Thanks for adding to PMX’s utility!

 

I, and I’m sure others, would gladly try out your MusicXML => PMX translator
if you would make it available. I’m sure we can find other ways to get some
MusixXML files besides scanning with the somewhat costly software you
mentioned.  If you choose to upload, the method is up to you…I’m sure Bob
Tennent would be willing to set up a link from the icking archive, or as
suggested earlier you could perhaps use github (although I personally detest
that site due to its overly complicated user interface).

 

--Don Simons

 

From: TeX-Music [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dieter
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 5:39 AM
To: Werner Icking Music Archive
Subject: [Tex-music] Scanner Input for PMX

 

Dear PMX users,

I want to rapidly communicate on my recent experiences with Scanner input
into PMX.

In my choir we often have the task of modifying existing notes either in
parts of the  music or the text. 
And I do not want any handwritten corrections, but something which looks
nice. This, of course, I produce with PMX. 

Manually turning existing note sheets into PMX code is straightforward and
quite fast. But with a Scanner it would be much faster.
So I made some experimentation with the Scanner Software Smart Eye from
VISIV /UK.  Smart Eye generates after scanning (among other options)  output
in terms of MusicXML,
which has been developed by Recordare ( <http://www.musicxml.com>
www.musicxml.com).

In the last two weeks I have been working on a prototype which reads in
MusicXML and spits out the notes part for PMX. I include as example a
christmas carol
for SATB. After scanning there remained some inaccuracies, which could
easily resoved with the notes editor of SharpEye. 

The final MusicXML code has not been touched, and everything after  and
including the line "% Bar     1" has been generated automatically.

Of course, my little prototype does not  (yet) completely implement
MusicXML. Another drawback for wider use of my development might be, that I
employed a somewhat exotic language:  OBERON from Niklaus Wirth of the ETHZ
Zürich.

You are most welcome to further discuss this topic.

Regards,
Dieter






-- 
____________________________________
Dr. Dieter Glötzel
Im Rosengarten 27
64367 Mühltal
Tel.: 06151 / 360 82 72






-------------------------------
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music






-- 
____________________________________
Dr. Dieter Glötzel
Im Rosengarten 27
64367 Mühltal
Tel.: 06151 / 360 82 72
-------------------------------
[email protected] mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Reply via email to