Oops...the hidden .tex files were in doc\generic\musixtex\addons.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: TeX-Music [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Don
> Simons
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 5:22 PM
> To: 'Werner Icking Music Archive'
> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] musixps issues
> 
> Bob--
> 
> I just successfully created musixdoc.pdf from musixdoc.tex, version 1.15
> dated April 2011. On the initial latex pass, tex failed to find curly.tex
and
> tuplet.tex. I'm using MiKTeX 2.9 and I think I got musixtex through that.
I
> seem to remember some recent mention about some .tex components
> getting put in strange places in the distribution and sure enough I found
both
> curly.tex and tuplet.tex in the MiKTeX folder doc\generic\musixtex, which
> was not in my MiKTeX path. Once I fixed that (rather annoying!) problem,
it
> was smooth sailing, with the following manual steps, as listed in the
> document itself:
> 
> latex musixdoc
> musixflx musixdoc
> latex musixdoc
> makeindex -l musixdoc
> latex musixdoc
> latex musixdoc
> dvips -e0 -t a4 -P pdf -G0 musixdoc
> 
> The last step created a .ps but not a .pdf as I might have expected. I ran
> gsview 5.0 on the .ps and successfully generated a pdf with  "convert".
> 
> If there's any other info you'd care to have let me know. Personally I'd
like to
> have a link to or copy of the version of musixdoc.tex you're using, so I
can
> see if it's any different, and if so, whether my production scheme runs
into
> any problems with that. That would isolate whether the problem was caused
> by something that changed in musixdoc.tex, or some difference in your
> processing scheme from mine.
> 
> --Don Simons
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: TeX-Music [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob
> > Tennent
> > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 7:56 AM
> > To: Werner Icking Music Archive
> > Subject: Re: [Tex-music] musixps issues
> >
> >  >|I'm an idiot when it comes to TeXnical details,
> >
> > This would appear to be a Postscript, rather than a TeX, issue. I'm
> > even
> more
> > unknowledgeable about the former than the latter.
> >
> >  >|but I did notice this at line 153 of musixps.tex:
> >
> >  >|% everything else is stored in PostScript variables.
> >  >|% If you run out of the PostScript dictionary used for  >|% slurs,
> > you
> can
> > increase its size by changing the number  >|% 200 in the first line of
> > psslurs.pro to anything  >|% reasonable. (The number says how many
> > tokens can be  >|% defined.)
> >
> >  >|Did you try that?
> >
> > Yes:
> >
> >  >|> I've tried increasing the size of the dictionary as  >|>
> > suggested in
> the
> > comments in musixps.tex, to no avail.
> >
> > Is 2000 reasonable?
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >  >|> -----Original Message-----
> >  >|> From: TeX-Music [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> > Bob
> > >|> Tennent  >|> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 7:10 AM  >|> To: tex-
> > [email protected]  >|> Subject: [Tex-music] musixps issues  >|>  >|> I'm
> having
> > trouble with a large LaTeX document with many music extracts  >|(in
> > >|> fact, musixdoc.tex). The symptom is that ghostscript (in any form:
> >  >|ps2pdf,
> >  >|gv,
> >  >|> gsview,...) crashes.
> >  >|> The only *consistent* workaround is not to load musixps.tex.
> >  >|>
> >  >|> I can workaround any *particular* crash by doing apparently
> > random
> > >|things  >|> unrelated to slurs etc., such as changing the font
> > >|famly,
> > changing the  >|font  >|> encoding, changing the font size for the
> > table
> of
> > contents, etc. But,  >|> conversely, any small edit to the document
> > can suddenly make the build  >|fail  >|> and I have to mess around
> > with other changes until I can see the  >|effect of  >|> the edit (or
> > view the dvi
> file).
> >  >|>
> >  >|> If I build the document without the chapter that loads
> > musixps.tex,
> >|>
> > everything works. But if I build *just* that chapter with the standard
> >|>
> > preamble, everything works as well. This suggests some kind of
> >|Postscript
> > >|> resource (such as maximum stack size) is insufficient. I've tried
> > >|increasing the  >|> size of the dictionary as suggested in the
> > >|comments
> in
> > musixps.tex,  >|to no  >|> avail. Any ideas?
> >  >|>
> >  >|> Bob T.
> >  >|>
> >  >|> P.S. Stanislav Kneifl, the author of musixps.tex, says "I am out
> > of
> TeX
> > >|> business for some time, so I am afraid I won't be of much help
here."
> >  >|> -------------------------------
> >  >|> [email protected] mailing list
> >  >|> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to  >|>
> > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
> >  >|
> >  >|-------------------------------
> >  >|[email protected] mailing list
> >  >|If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> > >|http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
> >  >|
> >
> > -------------------------------
> > [email protected] mailing list
> > If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
> 
> -------------------------------
> [email protected] mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

-------------------------------
[email protected] mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Reply via email to