On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Michael Renzmann <mrenzm...@otaku42.de> wrote:
>
> The main issue that prevented me from performing the upgrade to the "live"
> t-h.o is: speed. You will notice it when you visit places in the testbed
> installation which present a list of hacks, such as the WikiStart page:
> it's painfully slow. IIRC I've investigated the reason for the issue and
> found that rendering the links to each hack's wiki page and tag pages is
> pretty time consuming.
>
> I've then started to implement a cache for these things, so that the
> rendering happens only once, but got stuck somewhere in the middle. If I
> remember correctly, the latest state of that work is not yet available in
> the repository. Anyway, Trac meanwhile implements its own cache
> implementation, which is much better than what I came up with and which
> thus should be used for our purposes. I have to look at that stuff again.

So, Trac 0.11 doesn't have this cache, so we won't get any improvement
there, but why on 0.10 this works faster??

>>  * Also: Upgrade subversion server/repository to 1.6.x
>
> I'll set that on my list. However, this step requires the use of packages
> from Debian Backports, since Lenny usually comes with 1.5.1.
>
> By the way: what is the benefit of the new version for our purposes?

Merges at least. 1.5.x are known to provide a lot of problems with
these. Perhaps it can also affect performance issues. Debian guys are
strange - see the list of bugfixes at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/tags/1.6.12/CHANGES - I do
not know what are they thinking about leaving 1.5.1 for ordinary
folks. I run backported version on Lenny without any problems.

--
anatoly t.
_______________________________________________
th-users mailing list
th-users@lists.trac-hacks.org
https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users

Reply via email to