Hi. >> I've then started to implement a cache for these things, so that the >> rendering happens only once, but got stuck somewhere in the middle. If I >> remember correctly, the latest state of that work is not yet available >> in the repository. Anyway, Trac meanwhile implements its own cache >> implementation, which is much better than what I came up with and which >> thus should be used for our purposes. I have to look at that stuff >> again. > > So, Trac 0.11 doesn't have this cache, so we won't get any improvement > there, but why on 0.10 this works faster??
Well, I think in the end the speed issues are caused by Genshi. It's a known fact that Genshi is generally a bit slower than Clearsilver. In addition, there have been a lot of changes in how the hacks listings are generated (just compare the hacks list on both, the live and the testbed site). > Debian guys are strange - see the list of bugfixes at > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/tags/1.6.12/CHANGES - I do > not know what are they thinking about leaving 1.5.1 for ordinary > folks. I run backported version on Lenny without any problems. That's Debian policy, I think - once "stable" is stable, the packages are not updated to new program versions. Of course that means you won't run top-notch versions on your Debian server, but you can be sure that your server remains stable and that configuration changes and other "hickups", which may result from upgrading packages to a new program version will not occur unless you upgrade to the next new stable. Personally, I prefer this scheme over running a production server on the bleeding edge :) Bye, Mike _______________________________________________ th-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
