Q and A of Mr Gopalakrishnan 1/11/23

   I find in these Q and A, UNAUTHENTIC VERSIONS BLUE DOCUMENTS, written by
young kids of India and Zakir Naik, like foreigners   demeaning India,
which are reproduced for which act Mr G is solely responsible, as he is
aged 80, an Indian, a brahmin, and he shall not insult our nation as if he
is chit chatting in a booze party at the age of 25. He owes heavy
responsibility for the groups and its decency and authentic matter for the
future generations. Because someone says Bori and some version, Mr G cannot
rely on that or escape away from the responsibility. Can he show where
exactly in Bori version it is said like that? And many more he wrote which
were re written by me for which he owes an apology to all.

Q1       VANA PARVA SEC 3 SECTION CCLXVIII IN THE WORDS OF DRAUPADI AND
VEDA VYASA    KR   Draupadi version of treating all as the same is revealed
as shown below and there were no write up by Vyasa she bed with X and Y in
such a such a taste. Let G have regard for the Vedic nature of this nation:

   Vaisampayana said, "The hostile Kshatriyas, incensed at sight of
Bhimasena and Arjuna, sent up a loud shout in the forest. And the wicked
king Jayadratha, when he saw the standards of those bulls of the Kuru race,
lost his heart, and addressing the resplendent Yagnaseni seated on his car,
said, 'Those five great warriors, O Krishna, that are coming, are I
believe, thy husbands. As thou knowest the sons of Pandu well, do thou, O
lady of beautiful tresses, describe them one by one to us, pointing out
which of them rideth which car!' Thus addressed, Draupadi replied, 'Having
done this violent deed calculated to shorten thy life, what will it avail
thee now, O fool, to know the names of those great warriors, for, now that
my heroic husbands are come, not one of ye will be left alive in battle.
However, as thou art on the point of death and hast asked me, I will tell
thee everything, this being consistent with the ordinance. Beholding king
Yudhishthira the just with his younger brothers, I have not the slighest
anxiety or fear from thee! That warrior at the top of whose flagstaff two
handsome and sonorous tabours called *Nanda* and *Upananda* are constantly
played upon, --he, O Sauvira chief, hath a correct knowledge of the
morality of his own acts. Men that have attained success always walk in his
train. With a complexion like that of pure gold, possessed of a prominent
nose and large eyes, and endued with a slender make, that husband of mine
is known among people by the name of Yudhishthira, the son of Dharma and
the foremost of the Kuru race. That virtuous prince of men granteth life to
even a foe that yields. Therefore, O fool, throwing down thy arms and
joining thy hands, run to him for thy good, to seek his protection. And
that other man whom thou seest with long arms and tall as the full-grown
*Sala* tree, seated on his chariot, biting his lips, and contracting his
forehead so as to bring the two eye-brows together, is he,--my husband
Vrikodara! Steeds of the noblest breed, plump and strong, well-trained and
endued with great might, draw the cars of that warrior! His achievements
are superhuman. He is known, therefore, by the name of *Bhima* on earth.
They that offend him are never suffered to live. He never forgetteth a foe.
On some pretext or other he wrecketh his vengeance. Nor is he pacified even
after he has wrecked a signal vengeance. And there, that foremost of
bowmen, endued with intelligence and renown, with senses under complete
control and reverence for the old--that brother and disciple of
Yudhishthira--is my husband Dhananjaya! Virtue he never forsaketh, from
lust or fear or anger! Nor doth he ever commits a deed that is cruel.
Endued with the energy of fire and capable of withstanding every foe, that
grinder of enemies is the son of Kunti. And that other youth, versed in
every question of morality and profit, whoever dispelleth the fears of the
affrighted, who is endued with high wisdom, who is considered as the
handsomest person in the whole world and who is protected by all the sons
of Pandu, being regarded by them as dearer to them than their own lives for
his unflinching devotion to them, is my husband Nakula possessed of great
prowess. Endued with high wisdom and having Sahadeva for his second,
possessed of exceeding lightness of hand, he fighteth with the sword,
making dexterous passes therewith. Thou, foolish man, shall witness today
his performances on the field of battle, like unto those of Indra amid the
ranks of Daityas! And that hero skilled in weapons and possessed of
intelligence and wisdom, and intent on doing what is agreeable to the son
of Dharma, that favourite and youngest born of the Pandavas, is my husband
Sahadeva! Heroic, intelligent, wise and ever wrathful there is not another
man equal unto him in intelligence or in eloquence amid assemblies of the
wise. Dearer to Kunti than her own soul, he is always mindful of the duties
of Kshatriyas, and would much sooner rush into fire or sacrifice his own
life than say anything that is opposed to religion and morals. When the
sons of Pandu will have killed thy warriors in battle, then wilt thou
behold thy army in the miserable plight of a ship on the sea wrecked with
its freight of jewels on the back of a whale. Thus, have I described unto
thee the prowess of the sons of Pandu, disregarding whom in thy
foolishness, thou hast acted so. If thou escapest unscathed from them,
then, indeed thou wilt have obtained a new lease of life.'"

Vaisampayana continued, "Then those five sons of Pritha, each like unto
Indra, filled with wrath, leaving the panic-stricken infantry alone who
were imploring them for mercy, rushed furiously upon the charioteers,
attacking them on all sides and darkening the very air with the thick
shower of arrows they shot." [Draupadi-Harana Parva] KR  I did not write
the Sanskrit verse as many may not read them.

Q3      Again the avivekam of the writer seen here; The Hinduism is ONE GOD
AND PEOPLE CALL IT IN MANY FORMS; THE WEST WRITES NONSENSE AS ONE WESY BOY
WROTE IT AND Mr G reproduced it calling himself as……… I am sorry. Even if
the question was that, Mr G should have produced the right answer. But
never he did so.

1.            "Ekam evadvitiyam". ("He is One only without a second.")
[Chandogya Upanishad 6:2:1]

2.   "Na casya kascij janita na cadhipah.". ("Of Him there are neither
parents nor lord.") [Svetasvatara Upanishad 6:9]

3.   "Na tasya pratima asti". ("There is no likeness of Him.")
[Svetasvatara Upanishad 4:19]

4.   "eko hi rudro na dvitīyāya tasthe ya imāṃl lokān īśata īśanībhiḥ
pratyaṅ janās tiṣṭhati saṃcukocāntakāle saṃsṛjya viśvā bhuvanāni gopāḥ"
[Svetasvatara Upanishad 3:2]

·         Rudra is truly one; for the knowers of Brahman do not admit the
existence of a second, He alone rules all the worlds by His powers. He
dwells as the inner Self of every living being. After having created all
the worlds, He, their Protector, takes them back into Himself at the end of
time.

5.   "He has no master in this world, no ruler, nor is there any symbol for
Him. He is the cause, the cause of all the causes. He has no father or
controller above Him." [Svetasvatara Upanishad 6:9]

   - The Brahma Sutra of Hinduism is:


   - "Ekam Brahm, dvitiya naste neh na naste kinchan" ("There is only one
      God, not the second; not at all, not at all, not in the least bit.")

Ekam Sat Vipraah bahudha vadanti: Sat=Truth is Ekam=one only. Vipraaha= The
enlightened/wise bahudhaa=in various ways vadanti=describe. Truth is one.
The wise describe it in various ways. The complete verse is:

“Indram Mitram Varunam Agnim aahur atho divyaha sa suparno garutmaan

Ekam Sad vipraah bahudhaa vadanti agnim yamam Matarishvaanam aahuhu.” “They
call Him Indra/King of heavens, Mitra/the sun-god, Varuna/the regent of
ocean, Agni/the fire god, and He is the beautiful winged heavenly Garuda.
The Truth is one but the wise describe It variously. They call Him Agni/god
of fire, Yama/god of death, Maatarishvaan/wind-god.”

The Supreme Reality is one without a second. It is the creator of the
entire universe; the fourteen worlds, and also, transcends it. This
Absolute Reality/God is above Existence and Non-Existence; above Cause and
Effect. It is above space, time and causation.

“Avibhaktam cha bhooteshu vibhaktam iva cha sthitam

Bhoota bhartr cha tat jneyam Grasishnu Prabhavishnu cha.” “The Integral
Divinity” is undivided like space. It appears divided in all animate and
inanimate beings. That Godhead which is the only object worth knowing, is
the sustainer of all beings as “Vishnu”, the destroyer as “Rudra” and the
creator of all as “Brahma.”[Bhagavad Geeta.Ch.XIII.verse 16]

The all pervading space appears divided in a pot, an urn, a barn, a needle
due to their forms. For the purpose of cognizance, each form is
symbolically given a name also. This in no way affect the Real Nature of
Space. Similarly the God/ One Absolute Truth manifests differently wielding
different powers and is called by different names. The creative potency is
called by the name ‘Chaturmukha Brahma’, the sustaining capacity is called
by the name ‘Vishnu’ and the destroying potency is called by the name,
‘Rudra’. It is the different roles performed by one God and hence addressed
variously.

The Brahadaranyaka Upanishad Chapter III

Ninth Brahmana: Many Gods and One Brahman

But, there was one man who would not listen to this advice. He had to do
something, and he puts a very intricate question. He was the last man to
query. There were eight people who put questions. Now the eighth man comes
and he dies actually, in the very audience, due to an incident that took
place on account of too much meaningless querying. He was called Śākalya.

1.   atha hainam vidagdhaḥ śākalyaḥ papraccha: katy devāḥ, yājñavalkya,
iti. sa haitayaiva nividā pratipede, yāvanto vaiśvadevasya nividy ucyante;
trayaś ca trī ca śatā, trayaś ca trī ca sahasreti. aum iti. hovāca, katy
eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya, iti. trayaś triṁśad iti. aum iti. hovāca, katy eva
devāḥ, yājñavalkya, iti. ṣaḍ iti. aum iti. hovāca, katy eva devāḥ,
yājñavalkya, iti. traya iti. aum iti. hovāca, katy eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya,
iti. drāv iti. aum iti. hovāca, katy eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya, iti. adhyardha
iti. aum iti. hovāca, katy eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya, iti. eka iti, aum iti,
hovāca katame te trayaś ca trī ca sahasreti.

*Atha hainam vidagdhaḥ śākalyaḥ papraccha:* This gentleman gets up and asks
certain questions. They are very very long queries, and very long answers
also are given. "How many gods are there?" This is what Vidagdha Śākalya
wanted to know. The question put to Yājñavalkya by Śākalya means this much
– *katy eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya, iti.*  *Sa haitayaiva nividā pratipede,
yāvanto vaiśvadevasya nividy ucyante.* When the question "How many gods are
there?" was put, Yājñavalkya contemplated the list of gods given in a
passage, or a Mantra of the Veda called the Nivid, which has reference to a
group of gods called Viśvedevas. And in accordance with the statement made
in that Mantra, called the Nivid in the Veda, Yājñavalkya says: *Trayaś ca
trī ca śatā:*  "Three hundred and three." The answer was given. Then he
says: *Trayaś ca trī ca sahasreti:* "Three thousand and three." "All right!
Let me see," was the retort of Śākalya. *Katy eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya:* "Is
this the answer that you give me to my question, how many gods are there?
Three thousand and three; three hundred and three! Have you no other answer
to this question?" Then Yājñavalkya gives another answer. *Trayaś triṁśad
iti:* "There are thirty-three gods." *Aum iti. hovāca:* "All right!" Again
he asks, not being satisfied with this answer. "Tell me again properly; how
many gods are there?" – *katy eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya. Ṣaḍ iti:*  "Six are
there." "All right!" He was not satisfied; he again asks a question. *Hovāca,
katy eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya:* "How many gods are there. Tell me again.
Think properly." *Traya iti:* "Only three gods are there." *Aum iti.
hovāca, katy eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya*: Not being satisfied, he asks again:
"How many gods are there? Tell again.*Drāv iti:* "Two gods are there."
Again he asks a question, not being satisfied. "Tell again; how many gods
are there?" *Katy eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya.* "One and a half gods" – *adhyardha
iti.* Then he was very much upset. "What is this you say, one and a half
gods. Tell again properly; how many gods are there?" – *Katy eva devāḥ,
yājñavalkya. Eka iti:* "One god is there," he said finally. So, a series
was recounted by Yājñavalkya in a very humorous manner, all of which has
some meaning which will be mentioned in the following passages. *Katame te
trayaś ca trī ca sahasreti:* "All these numbers that you have mentioned –
three thousand and three, three hundred and three – what are these gods?
Give the names of these gods, the deities." Then Yājñavalkya said:

2.   sa hovāca, mahimāna evaiṣām ete, trayas trimśat tv eva devā iti.
katame te trayas triṁśad iti. aṣṭau vasavaḥ ekādaśa rudrāḥ, dvādaśādityāḥ,
te ekatriṁśat indraś caiva prajāpatiś ca trayastriṁśāv iti.

Sa hovāca, mahimāna evaiṣām ete, trayas trimśat tv eva devā iti: "All these
three thousand and all that I mentioned – they are not really gods. They
are only manifestations of the thirty-three. The thirty-three are the
principal manifestations, and others are only their glories, radiances,
manifestations, magnificences or forces, energies, powers." "But what are
these thirty-three?" *katame te trayas triṁśad iti*. "The thirty-three gods
are eight Vasus, eleven Rudras, twelve ādityas – they make thirty-one (
*ekatriṁśat*) – then Indra and Prajāpati – these make thirty-three gods."

Now, these are called gods in a very special sense, and there is a meaning
behind their being designated as gods. The term 'god' means a power that
causally works inside a form. That which regulates from inside any
particular individual, groups of individuals, etc. is the god of that
individual or the god of that group of individuals. In a broad sense we may
say, the cause of anything is the deity of that thing. Now again we have to
bring to our mind the meaning of the word 'cause'. The deity does not
operate as an external cause. The sun as the cause of the eye is not the
sun that is ninety-three million miles away, disconnected from the eye in
space. That principle which controls the eye or any other organ has
something to do internally also with the structure of the organ. Likewise
is the case with every other function. The god of any particular phenomenon
is the invisible presence. So it will be mentioned here in the following
passages that every visible object has a presiding deity inside. Even the
hands cannot be lifted unless there is a force inside; the eyes cannot wink
unless there is a force inside the eyes, likewise with every other function
or limb of the individual. What are these Vasus, Rudras and ādityas? They
have to be explained. They are not far away from us. They are immanent
within us.

KR   May be Mr G hereafter writes on these lines in future; I had written
all these long ago but G did not grasp it out of quality suited to him.

Q5        True but see a video https://youtu.be/qtQbDEYX_Io

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

KR IRS  2 11 23
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123 <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 14:08
Subject: [iyer123] CULTURAL QA 11-2023-01
To: Patty Thatha <[email protected]>, Iyer <
[email protected]>, Kerala Iyer <[email protected]>


*CULTURAL QA 11-2023-01*

*All the BELOW    QA are from Quora DIGEST to me  on   01-11-2023.*

*Quora answers need not be 100% correct answers.*

*Compiled and posted by R. Gopala Krishnan, 80,  on 01-11-2023.*

*Q1         Did Draupadi like Nakul and Sahadev?*

*A1         Deepak Surana, Entrepreneur and Author (2017–present)1y*

*Yes Draupadi loved Nakul and Sahadev a lot. She might have also had a soft
corner for them as they were the youngest among the brothers (maybe her
age) and never got the due they actually deserved.*

*The Vyas Mahabharat is full of references which indicate how much she
loved them.*

*She gave birth to sons fathered by them.    She never protested against
their marriage with her.    She lamented for them in front of Yudhishthir
at the beginning of the exile.    She sung their praises highly when
Jaydrath asked her to identify them.    She lamented for them when she went
to Bhim to get rid of Kichak.*

*She always called Nakul as the most handsome, best swordsman, intelligent,
devoted brother, one who kept knowledge of Dharma and Economics and a man
with great memory.*

*Similarly she always reserved her best praise for Sahadev and took special
care of him during the exile.*

*During a tough climb over a mountain, Draupadi fainted and fell. It was
Nakul who ran to her and rescued her. Then along with Sahadev he pressed
her feet, treated her and ensured she was back to Normal. This cannot
happen without mutual love.*

*After all her sons were killed, Yudhishthir sent Nakul to get her.
Perhaps, he knew that Nakul was the only one capable to break such a
horrific news to her.*

*In Shanti Parva she said that my 5 husbands are like five senses. I would
have been happy even with one, getting 5 has increased my happiness 5
times.*

*She never blamed them for her sufferings because she knew that, despite
being powerful, they did not take many decisions in the Pandava family as
they were the youngest.*

*People always talk about Arjun-Draupadi or Bhim- Draupadi but for me
Nakul-Draupadi was one of the best pair of that era. The most beautiful
woman and the most handsome man. The best swordsman and the princess from
Panchal. Wow. Both of them must have been a sight to behold.*

*All points are based on Vyas Mahabharat GITA PRESS and BORI CE.*

*Q2         What is the healthiest fruit to eat on an empty stomach?*

*A2         Niharika Yadav,Reader | Writer | Gardener | Empath | Engineer |
LearnerJul 10*

*What one eats on an empty stomach can have a lasting effect on the overall
well being of any individual. So, the first thing in morning has to be
something nutritious, fulfilling and pleasing to the tongue. Fruits have a
win-win situation here, apart from being easy to include in diet, can you
guess what the other best part is?*

*There are so many options.*

*Now the tough part is to choose from the variety, trust me, been there,
done that.*

*The healthiest fruit one can eat on an empty stomach can vary from
person-to-person. We live in such a wide beautiful world with different
climate zones and besides this age and health history are also crucial
deciding factors.*

*But there is this one fruit admired by nutritionists, yoga experts,
holistic health practitioners and almost everyone.It is PAPAYA and here are
the reasons why?*

*All year round availability - Asia has been the leading papaya producing
region, accounting for 51% of the global production in 2011, followed by
South America (20%), Africa (11%), the Caribbean (9%) and Central America
(9%).*

*Gentle on the stomach - The magic is in the enzymes papain, a natural
digestive enzyme that breaks up foods and soothes the stomach by promoting
a healthy acidic environment.*

*Regulates bowel movement - An important key factor as in morning our
bodies are in detoxification mode and papaya can help to keep the
intestines spick and span.*

*This is just the tip of the iceberg as the health benefits are numerous.*

*GUAVA is another excellent choice after papaya and then comes WATERMELON.*

*I framed this answer with respect to the audience your question covers and
tried keeping it concise and to the point. It is highly suggested to always
start with introducing smaller quantity of any new food in your diet. In
case of an individual suffering from any allergic diseases irrespective of
the age, it is best to first consult a medical practitioner.*

*Q3         If Rig Veda says there is only one god, then who is the real
god, Shiva or Vishnu?*

*A3         Aditi Pathak,  Author and Servant of Lord Krishna Apr 22*

*According to the Rig Veda, there is only one ultimate reality, known as
Brahman or the Supreme Being. The various deities in Hinduism are
considered as manifestations or aspects of this one ultimate reality. Shiva
and Vishnu are two prominent deities in Hinduism who represent different
aspects of the Supreme Being.*

*Shiva is often associated with the aspect of destruction and
transformation, while Vishnu is associated with preservation and
protection. However, both are considered as equally important and revered
in Hinduism.*

*It is important to note that the concept of a single, all-encompassing God
in Hinduism is not the same as the monotheistic concept in Abrahamic
religions, which emphasizes the exclusivity of one God over all others. In
Hinduism, the various deities are seen as complementary aspects of the one
ultimate reality, and worship of one deity does not preclude worship of
others. Ultimately, the choice of which deity to worship is a matter of
personal preference and spiritual inclination.*

*Q4         Why can't we dig deeper than 12.2 km into the Earth?*

*A4         Chris Seymour,Former Mining Engineer (1983–2000)Updated 1y*

*I have travelled to about 3.5 kilometers beneath the surface at the
Western Deeps mine in South Africa. The problems of going deeper were
obvious.*

*We had to descend three separate shafts to reach the face, which took over
an hour. Shafts are limited to about 2,500 meters depth because the weight
of the wire rope holding the man-carrying cage exceeds the strength of the
rope. Even to reach that depth it is necessary to have a tapered rope.*

*The rock temperature was over 60 degrees C (140 degrees F). The mine
pumped thousands of tons of slurried ice down the mine every day in order
to maintain the air temperatures at workable levels.*

*Such depths are only possible because the rock surrounding the gold reefs
is very strong. However the rock is subject to immense stress. Sometimes it
breaks explosively in a ‘rockburst’. A month earlier a rockburst had killed
three miners.*

*The workings at the Mponeng shaft at that mine have now reached 4.2
kilometers below the surface.*

*The Russians drilled (not dug) a deeper hole at the Kola Superdeep hole.
They had planned to go to 15 kilometers but stopped at 12.26 kilometers
because the rock at 180 degrees C was hotter than expected. In a 23 cm (9
inch) wide hole it is not possible to pump down enough drilling fluid to
keep the drill head cool.*

*Drilling so deep is tedious and expensive. Pulling out the 600 or so drill
pipes in the string is very time-consuming every time the drill head needs
replacing. Maintaining as straight a hole as possible when it is 12,000
meters long but only 23 centimeters wide is difficult. Too many turns and
kinks in the hole cause unsustainable friction and forces on the drill
pipe.*

*The temperature of the rock causes difficulties with drill fluid chemistry
and degrades the strength of the drilling head and the drill pipe.*

*The same problem of supporting the weight of the pipe occurs and the hole
must be tapered.*

*In short a hole to a depth of 12 kilometers pushes drilling technology to
the limit.*

*In 1994 the Germans drilled a hole to 9100 meters using this rig:*

*The picture comes from this site
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215754446_The_German_Continental_Deep_Drilling_Program_KTB_-_Overview_and_Major_Results
<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215754446_The_German_Continental_Deep_Drilling_Program_KTB_-_Overview_and_Major_Results>*

*. The article has more information about why it’s so difficult to drill
deep holes.*

*In a comment someone suggested using a Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) to open
a spiral ramp down which vehicles could be driven. TBMs used to make spiral
ramps are quite common in mining, but there are many practical difficulties
using them beyond about 1500 metre depth. Typically 10% is about the
steepest grade that can be achieved. To get to 12 kilometre depth, you
would need to excavate a 120 kilometre long tunnel. Many kilometres of this
would be through rock at temperatures above 100 degrees C. Disposing of the
huge heat load would be difficult. Then the rock at 12 kilometres depth is
under a pressure of about 45,000 psi. At these pressures it will break into
the cavity, perhaps explosively. Of course TBMs typically have a support
system immediately behind them. However necessarily there is an unsupported
section. The face itself cannot be supported because the TBM is digging
into it. Behind the face there is some length which is not yet supported.*

*Q5         Which animal the anaconda can't kill?*

*A5         Wadiyat Narjis, Aug 3*

*The anaconda, one of the largest snakes in the world, is a formidable
predator that can overpower and kill a wide range of animals. However,
there are some species that may be able to defend themselves effectively
against an anaconda, making it difficult for the snake to kill them. Some
examples include:*

* Adult crocodiles: Large crocodiles have powerful jaws, armor-like scales,
and formidable strength, making them a challenging prey item for anacondas.
An anaconda would likely have difficulty subduing and killing a fully grown
crocodile.*

*Adult elephants: Adult elephants are massive and have thick, tough skin
that provides them with a strong defense against predators. An anaconda
would not be able to constrict an elephant and is unlikely to pose a
serious threat to it.*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/2934373.1064980.1698827904245%40mail.yahoo.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/2934373.1064980.1698827904245%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqOGKCiLTCOhmCF-AOOKEfruSvOU%2BtjmFkM4ZzC9MkAuA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to