The old insenile imbecile Bodyguard came to rescue of Gopalakrishnan with usual abnuses without any content, playing t and D and talking nonsense of his clay matter. The sishya does not know anything about Rig vedam but will adopt urchin Quora Q and A and reproduce his own saga of brutal ignorance; and his body guard will second him nonsensically. Oh GOD preposterous prenatal clay heads may have peace (piece) of mind KR IRS 51123 Ignorant Narayana don't💤 wake up from slumber
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2023 at 06:51 Subject: Re: [KeralaIyers] Fwd: [iyer123] CULTURAL QA 11-2023-01 To: iyer <[email protected]>, gopala krishnan <[email protected]> Cc: Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]> Dear folks When infantile imbecility and ignorance combines with adolescent arrogance and immaturity, and is compounded with geriatric insolence, senility and insanity, we get an uneducated unbridled disorientated iconoclast which has lost its senses and cannot distinguish between "sat" and "sad" in Sanskrit, but ploughs on in its self-created sea of mud with questionable quotes such as:- "Ekam Sat Vipraah bahudha vadanti" and "Ekam Sad vipraah bahudhaa vadanti." Not knowing the popular saying, "asatho maa sadgamayah", it is totally nonplussed when faced with the choices between "sath", "sat", "sad", and "sadh". Yet it pretends, as an unqualified unlearned pseudo-sacrados, to expound the r'g-veda axiom that there is only one god, even though learned scholars call it by many names. The original question posed by Sri Gopalakrishna was:- "*Q3 If Rig Veda says there is only one god, then who is the real god, Shiva or Vishnu?"* The stupid dalit-by-choice fool is unable to answer, but only berates Sri Gopalakrishna, and compares him with the Indian Muslim extremist jihadi preacher Zakir Naik (now hiding in Muslim-majority Malaysia), while the more appropriate comparison is with fakir and faker KR ex-IRS 2 11 23 himself. What or who is the one god -- the "sat" in Sanskrit? Katopanishad says, at 3rd Valli, verses 11 and 13 that it is the purusha, the paramaathma residing in all living beings as the life-force. Kaivalyopanishad says, at Cap I, v v 11 and 12, that it is umaa-maheshvara, who is aadi-madhya-antha-viheena ekam. He is Brahma, He is Shva, He is Indra, He is Vishnu, He is Praana, He is Time, He is Fire, He is the Moon. Dalits-by-choice, whom the English poet Shelley describes as the Indian Pariah (which I have quoted earlier in these columns), who have never ever undergone any samskaarams such as jaatha-karmam, naama-karanam, anna-praashanam, upanayanam, will not know that the mahaa sankalppam chanted solemnly by braahmanas at the annual veda upaakarmam concludes by consecrating the ceremony to the 330 million devathaas. *This makes nonsense of the reported claim that the discredited rebellious young student Yaajnyavalkya, who was expelled from Veda-paatashaala for insubordination, tried to answer the question posed above, and got lost in the morass of figures ranging from three to thirteen to thirty-one, and beyond.* S Narayanaswamy Iyer On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 5:29 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Q and A of Mr Gopalakrishnan 1/11/23 > > I find in these Q and A, UNAUTHENTIC VERSIONS BLUE DOCUMENTS, written > by young kids of India and Zakir Naik, like foreigners demeaning India, > which are reproduced for which act Mr G is solely responsible, as he is > aged 80, an Indian, a brahmin, and he shall not insult our nation as if he > is chit chatting in a booze party at the age of 25. He owes heavy > responsibility for the groups and its decency and authentic matter for the > future generations. Because someone says Bori and some version, Mr G cannot > rely on that or escape away from the responsibility. Can he show where > exactly in Bori version it is said like that? And many more he wrote which > were re written by me for which he owes an apology to all. > > Q1 VANA PARVA SEC 3 SECTION CCLXVIII IN THE WORDS OF DRAUPADI AND > VEDA VYASA KR Draupadi version of treating all as the same is revealed > as shown below and there were no write up by Vyasa she bed with X and Y in > such a such a taste. Let G have regard for the Vedic nature of this nation: > > Vaisampayana said, "The hostile Kshatriyas, incensed at sight of > Bhimasena and Arjuna, sent up a loud shout in the forest. And the wicked > king Jayadratha, when he saw the standards of those bulls of the Kuru race, > lost his heart, and addressing the resplendent Yagnaseni seated on his car, > said, 'Those five great warriors, O Krishna, that are coming, are I > believe, thy husbands. As thou knowest the sons of Pandu well, do thou, O > lady of beautiful tresses, describe them one by one to us, pointing out > which of them rideth which car!' Thus addressed, Draupadi replied, 'Having > done this violent deed calculated to shorten thy life, what will it avail > thee now, O fool, to know the names of those great warriors, for, now that > my heroic husbands are come, not one of ye will be left alive in battle. > However, as thou art on the point of death and hast asked me, I will tell > thee everything, this being consistent with the ordinance. Beholding king > Yudhishthira the just with his younger brothers, I have not the slighest > anxiety or fear from thee! That warrior at the top of whose flagstaff two > handsome and sonorous tabours called *Nanda* and *Upananda* are > constantly played upon, --he, O Sauvira chief, hath a correct knowledge of > the morality of his own acts. Men that have attained success always walk > in his train. With a complexion like that of pure gold, possessed of a > prominent nose and large eyes, and endued with a slender make, that husband > of mine is known among people by the name of Yudhishthira, the son of > Dharma and the foremost of the Kuru race. That virtuous prince of men > granteth life to even a foe that yields. Therefore, O fool, throwing down > thy arms and joining thy hands, run to him for thy good, to seek his > protection. And that other man whom thou seest with long arms and tall as > the full-grown *Sala* tree, seated on his chariot, biting his lips, and > contracting his forehead so as to bring the two eye-brows together, is he,--my > husband Vrikodara! Steeds of the noblest breed, plump and strong, > well-trained and endued with great might, draw the cars of that warrior! > His achievements are superhuman. He is known, therefore, by the name of > *Bhima* on earth. They that offend him are never suffered to live. He > never forgetteth a foe. On some pretext or other he wrecketh his vengeance. > Nor is he pacified even after he has wrecked a signal vengeance. And > there, that foremost of bowmen, endued with intelligence and renown, with > senses under complete control and reverence for the old--that brother and > disciple of Yudhishthira--is my husband Dhananjaya! Virtue he never > forsaketh, from lust or fear or anger! Nor doth he ever commits a deed that > is cruel. Endued with the energy of fire and capable of withstanding every > foe, that grinder of enemies is the son of Kunti. And that other youth, > versed in every question of morality and profit, whoever dispelleth the > fears of the affrighted, who is endued with high wisdom, who is considered > as the handsomest person in the whole world and who is protected by all the > sons of Pandu, being regarded by them as dearer to them than their own > lives for his unflinching devotion to them, is my husband Nakula > possessed of great prowess. Endued with high wisdom and having Sahadeva > for his second, possessed of exceeding lightness of hand, he fighteth > with the sword, making dexterous passes therewith. Thou, foolish man, shall > witness today his performances on the field of battle, like unto those of > Indra amid the ranks of Daityas! And that hero skilled in weapons and > possessed of intelligence and wisdom, and intent on doing what is agreeable > to the son of Dharma, that favourite and youngest born of the Pandavas, is > my husband Sahadeva! Heroic, intelligent, wise and ever wrathful there is > not another man equal unto him in intelligence or in eloquence amid > assemblies of the wise. Dearer to Kunti than her own soul, he is always > mindful of the duties of Kshatriyas, and would much sooner rush into fire > or sacrifice his own life than say anything that is opposed to religion and > morals. When the sons of Pandu will have killed thy warriors in battle, > then wilt thou behold thy army in the miserable plight of a ship on the sea > wrecked with its freight of jewels on the back of a whale. Thus, have I > described unto thee the prowess of the sons of Pandu, disregarding whom in > thy foolishness, thou hast acted so. If thou escapest unscathed from > them, then, indeed thou wilt have obtained a new lease of life.'" > > Vaisampayana continued, "Then those five sons of Pritha, each like unto > Indra, filled with wrath, leaving the panic-stricken infantry alone who > were imploring them for mercy, rushed furiously upon the charioteers, > attacking them on all sides and darkening the very air with the thick > shower of arrows they shot." [Draupadi-Harana Parva] KR I did not write > the Sanskrit verse as many may not read them. > > Q3 Again the avivekam of the writer seen here; The Hinduism is ONE > GOD AND PEOPLE CALL IT IN MANY FORMS; THE WEST WRITES NONSENSE AS ONE WESY > BOY WROTE IT AND Mr G reproduced it calling himself as……… I am sorry. Even > if the question was that, Mr G should have produced the right answer. But > never he did so. > > 1. "Ekam evadvitiyam". ("He is One only without a second.") > [Chandogya Upanishad 6:2:1] > > 2. "Na casya kascij janita na cadhipah.". ("Of Him there are neither > parents nor lord.") [Svetasvatara Upanishad 6:9] > > 3. "Na tasya pratima asti". ("There is no likeness of Him.") > [Svetasvatara Upanishad 4:19] > > 4. "eko hi rudro na dvitīyāya tasthe ya imāṃl lokān īśata īśanībhiḥ > pratyaṅ janās tiṣṭhati saṃcukocāntakāle saṃsṛjya viśvā bhuvanāni gopāḥ" > [Svetasvatara Upanishad 3:2] > > · Rudra is truly one; for the knowers of Brahman do not admit the > existence of a second, He alone rules all the worlds by His powers. He > dwells as the inner Self of every living being. After having created all > the worlds, He, their Protector, takes them back into Himself at the end of > time. > > 5. "He has no master in this world, no ruler, nor is there any symbol > for Him. He is the cause, the cause of all the causes. He has no father or > controller above Him." [Svetasvatara Upanishad 6:9] > > - The Brahma Sutra of Hinduism is: > > > - "Ekam Brahm, dvitiya naste neh na naste kinchan" ("There is only one > God, not the second; not at all, not at all, not in the least bit.") > > Ekam Sat Vipraah bahudha vadanti: Sat=Truth is Ekam=one only. Vipraaha= > The enlightened/wise bahudhaa=in various ways vadanti=describe. Truth is > one. The wise describe it in various ways. The complete verse is: > > “Indram Mitram Varunam Agnim aahur atho divyaha sa suparno garutmaan > > Ekam Sad vipraah bahudhaa vadanti agnim yamam Matarishvaanam aahuhu.” > “They call Him Indra/King of heavens, Mitra/the sun-god, Varuna/the regent > of ocean, Agni/the fire god, and He is the beautiful winged heavenly > Garuda. The Truth is one but the wise describe It variously. They call Him > Agni/god of fire, Yama/god of death, Maatarishvaan/wind-god.” > > The Supreme Reality is one without a second. It is the creator of the > entire universe; the fourteen worlds, and also, transcends it. This > Absolute Reality/God is above Existence and Non-Existence; above Cause and > Effect. It is above space, time and causation. > > “Avibhaktam cha bhooteshu vibhaktam iva cha sthitam > > Bhoota bhartr cha tat jneyam Grasishnu Prabhavishnu cha.” “The Integral > Divinity” is undivided like space. It appears divided in all animate and > inanimate beings. That Godhead which is the only object worth knowing, is > the sustainer of all beings as “Vishnu”, the destroyer as “Rudra” and the > creator of all as “Brahma.”[Bhagavad Geeta.Ch.XIII.verse 16] > > The all pervading space appears divided in a pot, an urn, a barn, a needle > due to their forms. For the purpose of cognizance, each form is > symbolically given a name also. This in no way affect the Real Nature of > Space. Similarly the God/ One Absolute Truth manifests differently wielding > different powers and is called by different names. The creative potency is > called by the name ‘Chaturmukha Brahma’, the sustaining capacity is called > by the name ‘Vishnu’ and the destroying potency is called by the name, > ‘Rudra’. It is the different roles performed by one God and hence addressed > variously. > > The Brahadaranyaka Upanishad Chapter III > > Ninth Brahmana: Many Gods and One Brahman > > But, there was one man who would not listen to this advice. He had to do > something, and he puts a very intricate question. He was the last man to > query. There were eight people who put questions. Now the eighth man comes > and he dies actually, in the very audience, due to an incident that took > place on account of too much meaningless querying. He was called Śākalya. > > 1. atha hainam vidagdhaḥ śākalyaḥ papraccha: katy devāḥ, yājñavalkya, > iti. sa haitayaiva nividā pratipede, yāvanto vaiśvadevasya nividy ucyante; > trayaś ca trī ca śatā, trayaś ca trī ca sahasreti. aum iti. hovāca, katy > eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya, iti. trayaś triṁśad iti. aum iti. hovāca, katy eva > devāḥ, yājñavalkya, iti. ṣaḍ iti. aum iti. hovāca, katy eva devāḥ, > yājñavalkya, iti. traya iti. aum iti. hovāca, katy eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya, > iti. drāv iti. aum iti. hovāca, katy eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya, iti. adhyardha > iti. aum iti. hovāca, katy eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya, iti. eka iti, aum iti, > hovāca katame te trayaś ca trī ca sahasreti. > > *Atha hainam vidagdhaḥ śākalyaḥ papraccha:* This gentleman gets up and > asks certain questions. They are very very long queries, and very long > answers also are given. "How many gods are there?" This is what Vidagdha > Śākalya wanted to know. The question put to Yājñavalkya by Śākalya means > this much – *katy eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya, iti.* *Sa haitayaiva nividā > pratipede, yāvanto vaiśvadevasya nividy ucyante.* When the question "How > many gods are there?" was put, Yājñavalkya contemplated the list of gods > given in a passage, or a Mantra of the Veda called the Nivid, which has > reference to a group of gods called Viśvedevas. And in accordance with the > statement made in that Mantra, called the Nivid in the Veda, Yājñavalkya > says: *Trayaś ca trī ca śatā:* "Three hundred and three." The answer was > given. Then he says: *Trayaś ca trī ca sahasreti:* "Three thousand and > three." "All right! Let me see," was the retort of Śākalya. *Katy eva > devāḥ, yājñavalkya:* "Is this the answer that you give me to my question, > how many gods are there? Three thousand and three; three hundred and three! > Have you no other answer to this question?" Then Yājñavalkya gives another > answer. *Trayaś triṁśad iti:* "There are thirty-three gods." *Aum iti. > hovāca:* "All right!" Again he asks, not being satisfied with this > answer. "Tell me again properly; how many gods are there?" – *katy eva > devāḥ, yājñavalkya. Ṣaḍ iti:* "Six are there." "All right!" He was not > satisfied; he again asks a question. *Hovāca, katy eva devāḥ, > yājñavalkya:* "How many gods are there. Tell me again. Think properly." *Traya > iti:* "Only three gods are there." *Aum iti. hovāca, katy eva devāḥ, > yājñavalkya*: Not being satisfied, he asks again: "How many gods are > there? Tell again.*Drāv iti:* "Two gods are there." Again he asks a > question, not being satisfied. "Tell again; how many gods are there?" *Katy > eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya.* "One and a half gods" – *adhyardha iti.* Then he > was very much upset. "What is this you say, one and a half gods. Tell again > properly; how many gods are there?" – *Katy eva devāḥ, yājñavalkya. Eka > iti:* "One god is there," he said finally. So, a series was recounted by > Yājñavalkya in a very humorous manner, all of which has some meaning which > will be mentioned in the following passages. *Katame te trayaś ca trī ca > sahasreti:* "All these numbers that you have mentioned – three thousand > and three, three hundred and three – what are these gods? Give the names of > these gods, the deities." Then Yājñavalkya said: > > 2. sa hovāca, mahimāna evaiṣām ete, trayas trimśat tv eva devā iti. > katame te trayas triṁśad iti. aṣṭau vasavaḥ ekādaśa rudrāḥ, dvādaśādityāḥ, > te ekatriṁśat indraś caiva prajāpatiś ca trayastriṁśāv iti. > > Sa hovāca, mahimāna evaiṣām ete, trayas trimśat tv eva devā iti: "All > these three thousand and all that I mentioned – they are not really gods. > They are only manifestations of the thirty-three. The thirty-three are the > principal manifestations, and others are only their glories, radiances, > manifestations, magnificences or forces, energies, powers." "But what are > these thirty-three?" *katame te trayas triṁśad iti*. "The thirty-three > gods are eight Vasus, eleven Rudras, twelve ādityas – they make thirty-one ( > *ekatriṁśat*) – then Indra and Prajāpati – these make thirty-three gods." > > Now, these are called gods in a very special sense, and there is a meaning > behind their being designated as gods. The term 'god' means a power that > causally works inside a form. That which regulates from inside any > particular individual, groups of individuals, etc. is the god of that > individual or the god of that group of individuals. In a broad sense we may > say, the cause of anything is the deity of that thing. Now again we have to > bring to our mind the meaning of the word 'cause'. The deity does not > operate as an external cause. The sun as the cause of the eye is not the > sun that is ninety-three million miles away, disconnected from the eye in > space. That principle which controls the eye or any other organ has > something to do internally also with the structure of the organ. Likewise > is the case with every other function. The god of any particular phenomenon > is the invisible presence. So it will be mentioned here in the following > passages that every visible object has a presiding deity inside. Even the > hands cannot be lifted unless there is a force inside; the eyes cannot wink > unless there is a force inside the eyes, likewise with every other function > or limb of the individual. What are these Vasus, Rudras and ādityas? They > have to be explained. They are not far away from us. They are immanent > within us. > > KR May be Mr G hereafter writes on these lines in future; I had written > all these long ago but G did not grasp it out of quality suited to him. > > Q5 True but see a video https://youtu.be/qtQbDEYX_Io > > Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > KR IRS 2 11 23 > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123 <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 14:08 > Subject: [iyer123] CULTURAL QA 11-2023-01 > To: Patty Thatha <[email protected]>, Iyer < > [email protected]>, Kerala Iyer <[email protected]> > > > *CULTURAL QA 11-2023-01* > > *All the BELOW QA are from Quora DIGEST to me on 01-11-2023.* > > *Quora answers need not be 100% correct answers.* > > *Compiled and posted by R. Gopala Krishnan, 80, on 01-11-2023.* > > *Q1 Did Draupadi like Nakul and Sahadev?* > > *A1 Deepak Surana, Entrepreneur and Author (2017–present)1y* > > *Yes Draupadi loved Nakul and Sahadev a lot. She might have also had a > soft corner for them as they were the youngest among the brothers (maybe > her age) and never got the due they actually deserved.* > > *The Vyas Mahabharat is full of references which indicate how much she > loved them.* > > *She gave birth to sons fathered by them. She never protested against > their marriage with her. She lamented for them in front of Yudhishthir > at the beginning of the exile. She sung their praises highly when > Jaydrath asked her to identify them. She lamented for them when she went > to Bhim to get rid of Kichak.* > > *She always called Nakul as the most handsome, best swordsman, > intelligent, devoted brother, one who kept knowledge of Dharma and > Economics and a man with great memory.* > > *Similarly she always reserved her best praise for Sahadev and took > special care of him during the exile.* > > *During a tough climb over a mountain, Draupadi fainted and fell. It was > Nakul who ran to her and rescued her. Then along with Sahadev he pressed > her feet, treated her and ensured she was back to Normal. This cannot > happen without mutual love.* > > *After all her sons were killed, Yudhishthir sent Nakul to get her. > Perhaps, he knew that Nakul was the only one capable to break such a > horrific news to her.* > > *In Shanti Parva she said that my 5 husbands are like five senses. I would > have been happy even with one, getting 5 has increased my happiness 5 > times.* > > *She never blamed them for her sufferings because she knew that, despite > being powerful, they did not take many decisions in the Pandava family as > they were the youngest.* > > *People always talk about Arjun-Draupadi or Bhim- Draupadi but for me > Nakul-Draupadi was one of the best pair of that era. The most beautiful > woman and the most handsome man. The best swordsman and the princess from > Panchal. Wow. Both of them must have been a sight to behold.* > > *All points are based on Vyas Mahabharat GITA PRESS and BORI CE.* > > *Q2 What is the healthiest fruit to eat on an empty stomach?* > > *A2 Niharika Yadav,Reader | Writer | Gardener | Empath | Engineer > | LearnerJul 10* > > *What one eats on an empty stomach can have a lasting effect on the > overall well being of any individual. So, the first thing in morning has to > be something nutritious, fulfilling and pleasing to the tongue. Fruits have > a win-win situation here, apart from being easy to include in diet, can you > guess what the other best part is?* > > *There are so many options.* > > *Now the tough part is to choose from the variety, trust me, been there, > done that.* > > *The healthiest fruit one can eat on an empty stomach can vary from > person-to-person. We live in such a wide beautiful world with different > climate zones and besides this age and health history are also crucial > deciding factors.* > > *But there is this one fruit admired by nutritionists, yoga experts, > holistic health practitioners and almost everyone.It is PAPAYA and here are > the reasons why?* > > *All year round availability - Asia has been the leading papaya producing > region, accounting for 51% of the global production in 2011, followed by > South America (20%), Africa (11%), the Caribbean (9%) and Central America > (9%).* > > *Gentle on the stomach - The magic is in the enzymes papain, a natural > digestive enzyme that breaks up foods and soothes the stomach by promoting > a healthy acidic environment.* > > *Regulates bowel movement - An important key factor as in morning our > bodies are in detoxification mode and papaya can help to keep the > intestines spick and span.* > > *This is just the tip of the iceberg as the health benefits are numerous.* > > *GUAVA is another excellent choice after papaya and then comes WATERMELON.* > > *I framed this answer with respect to the audience your question covers > and tried keeping it concise and to the point. It is highly suggested to > always start with introducing smaller quantity of any new food in your > diet. In case of an individual suffering from any allergic diseases > irrespective of the age, it is best to first consult a medical > practitioner.* > > *Q3 If Rig Veda says there is only one god, then who is the real > god, Shiva or Vishnu?* > > *A3 Aditi Pathak, Author and Servant of Lord Krishna Apr 22* > > *According to the Rig Veda, there is only one ultimate reality, known as > Brahman or the Supreme Being. The various deities in Hinduism are > considered as manifestations or aspects of this one ultimate reality. Shiva > and Vishnu are two prominent deities in Hinduism who represent different > aspects of the Supreme Being.* > > *Shiva is often associated with the aspect of destruction and > transformation, while Vishnu is associated with preservation and > protection. However, both are considered as equally important and revered > in Hinduism.* > > *It is important to note that the concept of a single, all-encompassing > God in Hinduism is not the same as the monotheistic concept in Abrahamic > religions, which emphasizes the exclusivity of one God over all others. In > Hinduism, the various deities are seen as complementary aspects of the one > ultimate reality, and worship of one deity does not preclude worship of > others. Ultimately, the choice of which deity to worship is a matter of > personal preference and spiritual inclination.* > > *Q4 Why can't we dig deeper than 12.2 km into the Earth?* > > *A4 Chris Seymour,Former Mining Engineer (1983–2000)Updated 1y* > > *I have travelled to about 3.5 kilometers beneath the surface at the > Western Deeps mine in South Africa. The problems of going deeper were > obvious.* > > *We had to descend three separate shafts to reach the face, which took > over an hour. Shafts are limited to about 2,500 meters depth because the > weight of the wire rope holding the man-carrying cage exceeds the strength > of the rope. Even to reach that depth it is necessary to have a tapered > rope.* > > *The rock temperature was over 60 degrees C (140 degrees F). The mine > pumped thousands of tons of slurried ice down the mine every day in order > to maintain the air temperatures at workable levels.* > > *Such depths are only possible because the rock surrounding the gold reefs > is very strong. However the rock is subject to immense stress. Sometimes it > breaks explosively in a ‘rockburst’. A month earlier a rockburst had killed > three miners.* > > *The workings at the Mponeng shaft at that mine have now reached 4.2 > kilometers below the surface.* > > *The Russians drilled (not dug) a deeper hole at the Kola Superdeep hole. > They had planned to go to 15 kilometers but stopped at 12.26 kilometers > because the rock at 180 degrees C was hotter than expected. In a 23 cm (9 > inch) wide hole it is not possible to pump down enough drilling fluid to > keep the drill head cool.* > > *Drilling so deep is tedious and expensive. Pulling out the 600 or so > drill pipes in the string is very time-consuming every time the drill head > needs replacing. Maintaining as straight a hole as possible when it is > 12,000 meters long but only 23 centimeters wide is difficult. Too many > turns and kinks in the hole cause unsustainable friction and forces on the > drill pipe.* > > *The temperature of the rock causes difficulties with drill fluid > chemistry and degrades the strength of the drilling head and the drill > pipe.* > > *The same problem of supporting the weight of the pipe occurs and the hole > must be tapered.* > > *In short a hole to a depth of 12 kilometers pushes drilling technology to > the limit.* > > *In 1994 the Germans drilled a hole to 9100 meters using this rig:* > > *The picture comes from this site > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215754446_The_German_Continental_Deep_Drilling_Program_KTB_-_Overview_and_Major_Results > <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215754446_The_German_Continental_Deep_Drilling_Program_KTB_-_Overview_and_Major_Results>* > > *. The article has more information about why it’s so difficult to drill > deep holes.* > > *In a comment someone suggested using a Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) to > open a spiral ramp down which vehicles could be driven. TBMs used to make > spiral ramps are quite common in mining, but there are many practical > difficulties using them beyond about 1500 metre depth. Typically 10% is > about the steepest grade that can be achieved. To get to 12 kilometre > depth, you would need to excavate a 120 kilometre long tunnel. Many > kilometres of this would be through rock at temperatures above 100 degrees > C. Disposing of the huge heat load would be difficult. Then the rock at 12 > kilometres depth is under a pressure of about 45,000 psi. At these > pressures it will break into the cavity, perhaps explosively. Of course > TBMs typically have a support system immediately behind them. However > necessarily there is an unsupported section. The face itself cannot be > supported because the TBM is digging into it. Behind the face there is some > length which is not yet supported.* > > *Q5 Which animal the anaconda can't kill?* > > *A5 Wadiyat Narjis, Aug 3* > > *The anaconda, one of the largest snakes in the world, is a formidable > predator that can overpower and kill a wide range of animals. However, > there are some species that may be able to defend themselves effectively > against an anaconda, making it difficult for the snake to kill them. Some > examples include:* > > * Adult crocodiles: Large crocodiles have powerful jaws, armor-like > scales, and formidable strength, making them a challenging prey item for > anacondas. An anaconda would likely have difficulty subduing and killing a > fully grown crocodile.* > > *Adult elephants: Adult elephants are massive and have thick, tough skin > that provides them with a strong defense against predators. An anaconda > would not be able to constrict an elephant and is unlikely to pose a > serious threat to it.* > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "iyer123" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/2934373.1064980.1698827904245%40mail.yahoo.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/2934373.1064980.1698827904245%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust > > We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join > > Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup > > Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust > > Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions: > https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "KeralaIyers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZoqOGKCiLTCOhmCF-AOOKEfruSvOU%2BtjmFkM4ZzC9MkAuA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZoqOGKCiLTCOhmCF-AOOKEfruSvOU%2BtjmFkM4ZzC9MkAuA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iyer123" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhP9toCFeSxCZOnrPUFJG_UtYvcL4f-qwvxTR2GeR3DcAw%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhP9toCFeSxCZOnrPUFJG_UtYvcL4f-qwvxTR2GeR3DcAw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooFAAJtHVjDpBf6zK-5qSq3WCPB97EcoLVOO1b-YJ5DGw%40mail.gmail.com.
