True But Jews eat non veg and we offer to deity what we eat only Hence why would bother? Why jews? All the non brahmins who are non veg in kerala, TN AP and karnataka have Bali system though not considered as taboo but advised not to resort to . Nature is funny sir. People are afraid of mysterious things , unknown to their vision and brain. So inferior in thinking prostrate before whom they assume superior but neglect the real ones as those real, do not need these ignorant prostrations. What do we do with our servants? We order. Suppose you are friendly, only in TV serials they would address you as sir; but in reality they will place their hands on your shoulder; but when a sanyasi is so friendly, they do not do or attempt, because, in their vision, sanyasis are superior. Thus killing of animals or even eating the dead animal must be avoided; GOD; suppose all will behave as you wish; you will write that how we could afford the cost of veg. So what is being done is in order and we are reacting because we are too soft by nature. KR
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 11:10, Yeddanapudi Markandeyulu < [email protected]> wrote: > My focus simply is on animal sacrifice in Temples,by the Jewish Rabbis > etc.I have not written on any other topic. > YM > > On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 8:55 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> ANIMAL SACRIFICE DISCUSSION >> >> The ire of YMji is quite understandable. Because he is far away from >> animals and killing for any ecological purpose, he is able to express his >> ire. But animal killing animal, man killing man, animal killing man are >> all-natural phenomenon. Is there any place where tree leaves are not >> falling or branches gets cut down naturally? Bleeding human is horrible >> and cruel but bleeding women is cherished who undergo pain in all!! Could >> you stop your wife and daughter and mother from picking flower from plants >> which could also be killing the plants. Thus, we cherish as good what suits >> us but criticises when we don’t do that or incapable off doing all of them. >> We weigh according to our convenience. That is why non vegetarians gullibly >> argue that, plants have life so why pluck vegetables and consume and is >> that not an act of killing. TAKING AWAY LIFE is killing. No one has that >> right law says only wrt the scheduled objects and leave out the rest >> striding away. This is neither in support of nor holding it as right; but >> nature kills; floods kill; dryness kills; heat kills; cold kills; breeze >> kills; and so, it is in the nature to kill humans and the rest; and in turn >> human kills one below; King kills one below; Peon kills the temporary >> worker. Man man- slaughter and kills; man hits his wife and women and act >> as good but, kills. Abusing one is killing. Nature always treats the less >> powerful as its prey literally or indirectly, as licence poet to call >> anything as correct. >> >> Thus, lets imagine that, NO ANIMAL OR PLANTS ARE AFFECTED EVEN ON >> THE FLOORS OF THE EARTH THEY ARE LYING AS THEY HAVE LIFE, then, as they >> grow so fast, we will have to move away to the mountains, giving the space >> for them; and as we are not touching anything, all dead stink. So, then we >> will say to clear out all bad odours. The Artha sastra advocates that for >> a cause a village can be sacrificed. So certain acts of death in the nature >> in all species are inevitable. Even Vedas have not denied it which speaks >> about the non-consumption of liquor and animals. In Aswamedha yagnam we >> sacrifice the horse. Poring butte is also a kind of life sacrifice only >> Hence only Jains are enforcing such strong sweeping the floor while >> walking, lest small insects even do die. We can approach the issue with the >> minimum needs, but how to define that Yardstick-Minimum needs? >> >> While it's undoubtedly distressing to contemplate, there are >> scenarios where the killing of animals is unavoidable. Here's a nuanced >> argument: >> >> 1. One of the most significant reasons for animal killing is food >> production. Meat, dairy, and other animal products are staples in many >> diets worldwide. While efforts to promote plant-based diets can reduce the >> demand for animal products, it's unrealistic to expect the entire global >> population to switch overnight. Therefore, to meet current demand, animals >> must be raised and slaughtered for food. >> >> 2. In certain situations, killing animals may be necessary for >> self-defense or public safety. For example, if an animal poses an imminent >> threat to human life or property, such as in cases of aggressive wild >> animals or disease-carrying pests, euthanasia or other lethal measures may >> be required. Can we allow the mosquito annoyance and bites? >> >> 3. While controversial, animal testing has contributed to significant >> medical advancements. Pharmaceutical companies often conduct tests on >> animals to ensure the safety and efficacy of new drugs before they are >> approved for human use. While efforts are made to minimize harm to animals >> and explore alternative testing methods, some level of animal testing >> remains necessary for medical progress. How to test the drug? >> >> 4. In some cases, culling or controlling animal populations is >> necessary for ecological balance. Overpopulation of certain species can >> lead to environmental degradation, loss of biodiversity, and harm to other >> species. Hunting or culling programs may be implemented to manage wildlife >> populations and maintain ecosystem health. >> >> 5. Despite our best efforts to avoid it, animals are sometimes >> inadvertently harmed or killed in accidents, such as collisions with >> vehicles or industrial machinery. While these instances are regrettable, >> they are often unintentional and not driven by malice. >> >> While these arguments highlight scenarios where animal killing may be >> unavoidable, it's essential to prioritize ethical treatment and minimize >> harm whenever possible. This includes implementing humane farming >> practices, developing alternative testing methods, promoting wildlife >> conservation efforts, and improving infrastructure to reduce accidents >> involving animals. Ultimately, striving for a balance between human needs >> and animal welfare is crucial in addressing the complexities of animal >> killing in various contexts K Rajaram IRS 7524 >> >> On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 23:36, Markendeya Yeddanapudi < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> No animal sacrifices another animal to get benefit from God.But the >>> rotten human sacrifices often after terrible torture animals by the dozens >>> or even hundreds.He wants to impress God with this horrible cruelty.The >>> Jews too are no exception to this. >>> YM >>> >>> -- >>> *Mar* >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Thatha_Patty" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooc_NGsSRQN34%3Dvi36eZpfERC8iwAkLFrjzGpbBb5yjjA%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooc_NGsSRQN34%3Dvi36eZpfERC8iwAkLFrjzGpbBb5yjjA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopQV-gfV1W7bXKPnevL4cJyxwTLchQ5SUur8WLxY49D8A%40mail.gmail.com.
