God does not need empty prayers. God simply means nature, the great Siva, into whom one merges after attaining the speed of light. The basic step is a love filled feeling. Everything gets meaning only in feeling. But we adore the indifferent machines, substituting nature with machines.
KR: GOD DOES NOT NEED PRAYERS AT ALL. Work is worship; Pushpam, palam Toyam is worship' swadharma is worship; protection of dharma is a worship; and doing Sandhyavandhanam, but practicing arajakam, will not even place such, in the righteous orders, as seen from the Ramakrishna paramahamsa story of a Dasi and Brahmin, where Dasi went to heaven and Brahmin to the hell. Mazhitalum Neettalum Vendaavaam, Yakkaikku ulagam Pazhiuthathu , ozhithu vidin is Thirukkural; it means, why do you shave your head and remain a sanyasi?; why do you not shave because sastra have restrictions in the samskaras for the grhastha? Ulagam Pazhippadhu is adharma; so ULAGAM PAZHIPPATHU MEANS all activities of the arajakam,is abstained from- well, enough; tht is the best prayer ever we can have. So as siddas said, SUMMAYIRUTHALE SUGAM. It means that an idle mind is not a workshop. But doing work , action, and Karma, for the welfare of everyone , is the best prayer viz Nishkamya Karma ;B G says so. And when 99% are not doing it that way, is that not killing nature? While we are killing nature every second, we are more concerned about the trees and plants, cursing the machines and plants. Deserting the mother, but decently living with Flora and Fauna, is more serious than any pleadings for nature. 5 senses and sensible Nature will be happy, if only humans have the value and courage to demand the rights while executing the duty. K Rajaram IRS 8624 On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 at 08:18, Markendeya Yeddanapudi < [email protected]> wrote: > > > -- > *Mar*The Obedient Science and Technology > > > > Partnering with nature, and living as a macro person and interacting with > nature, via breathing, smelling, sensing, perceiving, feeling and self > identifying as nature needs absolute faith and love for nature. Love makes > one strive to remove the distance from the object of love. Lovers hug each > other, striving to eliminate the gap completely. Love for nature, makes one > adopt the method of breathing, smelling and sensing. One cannot be a make > believe outside observer, to do science. To do science, one must keep > nature at a distance and do manipulations, experiments, tortures, killing > etc on nature. Today we are totally indifferent to the complete destruction > of nature. We continue doing the destructive science and technology, even > after destroying more than half of the forests of the world, forests which > give habitation and livelihood to diverse flora and fauna, the feelings of > all of which participate in the inhalation of smell messages and exhalation > of smell responses. > > For doing it we have created science and technology, technology which has > no feelings and emotions. We are creating the obedient science and > technology, which does not suffer from empathy and the pangs of empathy. > This ultimate cruelty is euphemized as the great science advancement. > > Nature can only love and approve. But nature is not the obedient servant. > Nature also cannot understand the mechanized and non humane Newtonian > Economics, which is keeping distance from Ecology. The very course of > education has been diverted from Natural Geography and Ecology and > bludgeoned into the loveless mechanization. > > God does not need empty prayers. God simply means nature, the great Siva, > into whom one merges after attaining the speed of light. The basic step is > love filled feeling. Everything gets meaning only in feeling. But we adore > the indifferent machines, substituting nature with machines. At the very > hint of some technological manipulation called innovation, we destroy whole > forests to make way for machines. > > Today, we cannot find an MA,MBA,MCom,MSc,MTech,PHd,MD,LLM etc,etc,who > adopts smelling and sensing in nature to partner with nature and become > nature. All these worthies, whether really needed or not, somehow adopt > machines and create the machine driven work place while the experts in > management pontificate in Newtonized Psychology. They rain math equations > to make it look high brow. The AC conference Room, that gives the > conditioned air inside while blowing out the hot pollution outside the AC > Hall kills the content of nature from the persons in the conference. The AC > bloats the ego. > > Nature is not obedient and cannot cater to the ego. So kill nature and > adopt obedient and slave technology. > > YM > > Chat GPT > > The piece titled "The Obedient Science and Technology" expresses a deep > concern about the current trajectory of human interaction with nature > through the lens of science and technology. Here's a summary and analysis > of the main points: > > > > ### Summary > > > > 1. **Connection with Nature**: > > - The author advocates for a profound, intimate relationship with > nature, akin to that of lovers who strive to eliminate any distance between > them. This connection involves breathing, smelling, sensing, perceiving, > and feeling as intrinsic parts of nature. > > - Such a relationship requires faith and love, emphasizing the need > for empathy and the abolition of the observer's distance from nature. > > > > 2. **Critique of Modern Science and Technology**: > > - Modern science is criticized for maintaining a detached and > manipulative stance towards nature, leading to destructive practices such > as deforestation and habitat destruction. > > - Technology is described as lacking feelings and emotions, leading to > a dispassionate and often destructive engagement with the natural world. > > > > 3. **Indifference to Nature's Destruction**: > > - There's a strong condemnation of society's indifference to the > destruction of nature, with more than half of the world's forests already > gone. > > - The author points out the irony in celebrating technological > advancements while causing ecological devastation. > > > > 4. **Empathy and Ethics in Science**: > > - The narrative laments the absence of empathy and emotional > engagement in the current scientific and technological paradigm, which the > author views as the ultimate cruelty. > > > > 5. **Nature's Incompatibility with Mechanized Systems**: > > - Nature is portrayed as inherently unable to conform to mechanized > and non-human economic systems like Newtonian Economics, which distance > themselves from ecological considerations. > > - Educational courses have shifted from natural sciences to > mechanization, contributing to a disconnect from ecological awareness. > > > > 6. **Dehumanization through Technology**: > > - The author argues that modern education and professional fields > prioritize technology and machine-driven environments, leading to a loss of > natural connection. > > - Air-conditioned environments are used as a metaphor for > artificiality and ego inflation, contrasting with the humility and > authenticity of natural engagement. > > > > 7. **Spiritual Dimension**: > > - There's a spiritual undercurrent where God is equated with nature, > and merging with nature (or God) requires a speed of light akin to ultimate > understanding and unity. > > - Genuine connection with nature is seen as spiritually fulfilling, > unlike the artificial and ego-driven pursuit of technological advancements. > > > > ### Analysis > > > > The piece is a passionate critique of the current state of human-nature > interaction, emphasizing the emotional and ethical shortcomings of modern > science and technology. The author calls for a paradigm shift from a > mechanistic and detached approach to one that is empathetic, loving, and > deeply connected with nature. This involves: > > > > - **Revaluing Sensory Engagement**: Encouraging sensory and emotional > engagement with nature, rather than treating it as a mere object of study > or resource for exploitation. > > - **Redefining Progress**: Rethinking what constitutes progress, favoring > ecological harmony over technological dominance. > > - **Educational Reform**: Shifting educational priorities back towards > natural sciences and ecological awareness to foster a more sustainable and > empathetic worldview. > > - **Spiritual Reconnection**: Recognizing the spiritual dimension of > nature and seeking unity with it through love and empathy, rather than > control and manipulation. > > > > Overall, the piece calls for a profound transformation in how we perceive > and interact with the natural world, advocating for an ethic of care and > respect that aligns with both ecological sustainability and spiritual > fulfillment. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqSCAY-Tc%3DXbFjjqzSaiU2vP2-1a5B2kiNZW9Tfn1B7_Q%40mail.gmail.com.
