Another worm also woke up. The Darumi (K I D)Trying to spread gopal -darumi- wings which are missing. Unfortunately as Buddha said, one who is honest can throw the first stone is a perfect statement, then the K I D have no face at all; Gray matter dead; clay is also dead; K will write some sloka and use Neti; other than this he cannot take off. Even abusive words are reused mixtures; contentless and understanding brain is also -doubtful. "I" is a jalra who knows that he does not know anything and is bereft of content. D is a copy writer of a gossip column; and he does not even check what is what since every kid and old writing there are Nalanda university lecturers; so without content to write and without any know how to understand any content, D will blabber as darumi does. Thank you worms. Every day morning open and shut Thanks again OK start or restart your drill KR IRS
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 at 21:00, 'gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty < [email protected]> wrote: > Sir, > > What is the purpose of remarking the poor language of Mr Rajaram. He has > many followers who makes up from the *rubbish* presentation he makes. > > He has written "end justify the means". If I write so, I am first > standard. If he write so, he is U P S C selected IRS. Have you seen such > poor language with any IAS/IPS/IRS officers? > > If I correct the *"Goal justifies the path"*- I am not appreciated > because I am only departmentally promoted ITS. Some of our members find a > lot of difference between ITS and IRS. > > *"MAHABHARATHAM IS WELL DEFINED THROUGH Smd Bhagavat Gita whose prints are > in many languages written by many world scholars"* > > No body can make out what he means? Bhagavat Gita is a chapter in it. How > it's prints in many languages written by many world scholars? Probably he > means *translated*. > > *If I point out I am illiterate*. There are members who justify- IRS > officers language will be like that. Others have to make out. They will > never appreciate a promoted ITS above this IRS. Bad period. There are a > lot of blind followers for Mr Rajaram. In Tamil " > *amam, amam, amam" chamies* > > > *ROADS APLENTY BUT THE DESTINATION IS ONLY ONE SPOT."* > > Again the hurried Mr Rajaram does not read back, > * probably he means roads are plenty. If I correct destination is only > one, I am illiterate. * > > > *Gopalakrishnan* > > On Thursday, 27 June, 2024 at 06:49:41 am IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Dear folks > > The master of gobbledegook who knows nothing of anything sermonises, in > his usual drain-gutter-sewer broken English:- > > "*THE END JUSTIFY THE MEANS; MAHABHARATHAM IS WELL DEFINED THROUGH Smd > Bhagavat Gita whose prints are in many languages written by many world > scholars; Bible one book has same media found all over the earth, even free > in hotels free; but B G ranking second in multi-scopes, adopted universally > with the enlarged interpretations. NOT FORCED INTO ONLY ONE GROOVE; ROADS > APLENTY BUT THE DESTINATION IS ONLY ONE SPOT."* > > Irrelevancy combined with imbecility and irreversible senility, seeking to > impress the ignorant. > > S Narayanaswamy Iyer > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 8:49 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will > that it should become a universal law." > > xxxxxxxxx > > Immanuel Kant, a prominent 18th-century philosopher, formulated one of the > most influential ethical theories in the history of Western philosophy. > Central to his ethical theory is the "Categorical Imperative," which he > articulated in his seminal work, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. > One of the most famous formulations of the Categorical Imperative is: "Act > only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that > it should become a universal law." This principle serves as a cornerstone > for Kantian ethics, emphasizing the importance of universalizability, > rationality, and moral duty. > > What is that “The Principle of Universalizability: At its core, > Kant's maxim instructs individuals to act only on principles that could > be universally applied. A maxim, in Kantian terms, is a subjective > principle of action, essentially a rule that guides one's behaviour. To > determine whether a maxim can become a universal law, one must ask: "Can I > consistently will that everyone follows this rule without contradiction?" A > QUESTION WHERE THE PRINCIPLE FOR THE UNIVERSALITY IS CHAINED. Tiruvalluar > said, ULAGAM PAZHITHATHU OZHITHU VIDIN; AN UNIVERSAL FACTOR; ALL THE 100%? > Where we ai, for the sky, we stay atleast, on top of the earth; wishing to > spread the net far and wide; but majority is the application, where it > might change the 49% from immediate to some time later periods. The Vedas > say Santana dharma the way of life is universal and do cover the vishwam, > the universe, as, phrase is found all over, unlike the religions of the > world, only for the followers; hence it is apaurusheya; there is no one > book and one founder. > > And when it was in vogue, there were only a Bharatha varsha the entire > earth. That principle (Kant has high respect for the Hinduism) dharmic was > not, today fallowed by majority; still it is 3rd in Rank; It was Rank one > only; then II and now III. Still no other religion other than Buddhism and > way of life Hinduism, were much discussed, volumes were written. In so many > languages. There is single yoga to live; so whosoever likes whatsoever yoga > can be adopted; can be inside the ring or outside the ring; nay leave out > freely and re-enter. As a western philosopher commented, in India majority > of Hindus, why even 99% do not have any book of this faculty except some > CDs, and stotras; yet it nurtured then with fantasy, Kant says only that > kind of action with freedom. Without books a way of life expanded; only 2% > to 5% memorised it in parts; still all the available materials, broad casts > the science for the earth. PRINCIPE OF UNIVERSALITY. > > For instance, consider the maxim, "It is acceptable to lie to > achieve personal gain." If everyone adopted this rule, trust and > communication would break down, making the very act of lying > self-defeating. Thus, this maxim fails the test of universalizability and > cannot be morally acceptable. Conversely, a maxim like "One should keep > promises" can be universally willed without contradiction, as it supports a > foundation of trust and reliability essential for societal functioning. So > Hinduism in Sanskrit and Tirukkural in Tamil, said as A LIE AS IF THE > TRUTH; ONE MUST NOT LIE 100%; BUT ASWATTAMA HATHA KUNJARA: IS NOT BAD OR > IRRELEVANT. Satyan vadha is fundamental; but may bend a little for the > maintenance of dharma. Principle of the universality. > > Kantian ethics places a strong emphasis on rationality and > autonomy. Rational agents, according to Kant, are capable of recognizing > and acting upon universal moral laws. This capacity for rationality > distinguishes moral actions from mere inclinations or desires. By acting > according to maxims that can be universalized, individuals exercise their > rational autonomy, respecting themselves and others as ends in themselves > rather than as means to an end. Never bending the dharma; altering the way > of life according to the needs, within the four walls of the sanathana > Dharma. I kill men and animals, and the action is an act of HIM only and > not mine way of life; no sin does occur to such. No punyam also. > > For Kant, the moral worth of an action is determined not by its > consequences but by the intention behind it. Actions performed out of a > sense of duty, guided by the Categorical Imperative, possess true moral > value. This perspective contrasts sharply with consequentialist theories > like utilitarianism, which evaluate the morality of actions based on their > outcomes. Kant argues that the only unconditionally good thing is a "good > will"—the resolve to act according to moral principles for their own sake. > When individuals act from duty, motivated by respect for the moral law, > they embody the good will. This intrinsic motivation ensures that actions > are morally praiseworthy, regardless of their external results. THE END > JUSTIFY THE MEANS; MAHABHARATHAM IS WELL DEFINED THROUGH Smd Bhagavat Gita > whose prints are in many languages written by many world scholars; Bible > one book has same media found all over the earth, even free in hotels free; > but B G ranking second in multi-scopes, adopted universally with the > enlarged interpretations. NOT FORCED INTO ONLY ONE GROOVE; ROADS APLENTY > BUT THE DESTINATION IS ONLY ONE SPOT. > > Applying the Categorical Imperative involves scrutinizing one's > maxims and considering their universalizability. This process can guide > moral decision-making in various contexts, from personal dilemmas to > broader social policies. For example, in business ethics, a company might > evaluate its practices by asking whether they could be adopted universally > without undermining ethical standards or societal well-being. However, > Kant's deontological approach has faced criticisms. Some argue that its > rigidity and lack of consideration for consequences can lead to morally > questionable outcomes. For instance, strict adherence to the duty not to > lie might compel one to tell the truth in situations where it could cause > harm. Critics also question whether all moral principles can be neatly > universalized, given the complexity and diversity of human experiences. > > Kant's maxim, "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at > the same time, will that it should become a universal law," encapsulates a > profound and rigorous approach to ethics. It challenges individuals to > evaluate their actions through the lens of universalizability, emphasizing > rationality, autonomy, and moral duty. While not without its criticisms, > Kantian ethics offers a compelling framework for understanding and pursuing > moral behaviour, underscoring the timeless importance of acting with > integrity and respect for the moral law. And people knew better. > > K Rajaram IRS 27624 > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 at 18:42, Jambunathan Iyer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will > that it should become a universal law." > > In the above Quote Mr. Kant encourages all actions that could be > universally applied, promoting ethical consistency in living life. > > N Jambunathan Rengarajapuram-Kodambakkam-Chennai-Mob:9176159004 > > *" What you get by achieving your goals is not as important as what you > become by achieving your goals. If you want to live a happy life, tie it to > a goal, not to people or things "* > > -- > On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust > > We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join > > Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup > > Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust > > Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions: > https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "KeralaIyers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZorBmx3vUKRWXJdqT-skWGP8kxRPZ%3DE7yqvGi08bRLgEKA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZorBmx3vUKRWXJdqT-skWGP8kxRPZ%3DE7yqvGi08bRLgEKA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust > > We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join > > Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup > > Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust > > Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions: > https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "KeralaIyers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL4idhM446YeFZcGMuKaYQJ1NRMsZF%2BkXbNTP2h4G6MtD8ksNA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL4idhM446YeFZcGMuKaYQJ1NRMsZF%2BkXbNTP2h4G6MtD8ksNA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Thatha_Patty" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/810709545.35248.1719453595077%40mail.yahoo.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/810709545.35248.1719453595077%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoquu9VKvds2%2B2nPxHgdej%2BtpQhxQ7UcFRLcpisVN4LnyQ%40mail.gmail.com.
