yeah, haven't seen it, and like Shag, just isn't on top of my to do list.
There are other films i am looking forward to more...



On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:51 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Haven't seen it.  Would like to, but not high on my must-do list right
> now.
>
> The Irredeemable Shag
> http://firestormfan.com
> http://onceuponageek.com
> http://twitter.com/onceuponageek
>
>
>   -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [The Unique Geek] Has Sucker Punch been discussed yet?
> From: "Edward Crosby" <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, April 22, 2011 10:54 am
> To: [email protected]
>
> Nobody has comments on the movie? Am I the only one that has seen it?
> I would love to hear what others have to say.
>
> --
> Have a Better One,
> Edward Crosby
> http://about.me/edwardcrosby
> -----
> "There are no atheists in foxholes or firmware updates."
> Merlin Mann
>
>
> > I searched but didn't see we discussed this movie yet. I finally saw
> > Sucker Punch this past weekend.
> > **Possible Spoilers**
> >
> > Overall, I thought it was a pretty decent movie. It had some really good
> > action and great visual effects. The soundtrack totally kicked ass; I
> just
> > bought it on Amazon and am listening to it now. However, thinking about
> > it, most of the movie seemed like a music video stretched out, because of
> > all the slow motion, to 2 hours.
> > I plan on seeing it again when it comes out on DVD to reevaluate.
> >
> > On the subject of slow motion in movies: Like 3D, I am getting really
> sick
> > and tired of the over use of slow motion in movies. Unfortunately, I
> > rented Resident Evil: Afterlife on Netflix and noticed how, it seemed, an
> > hours worth of the hour and half film was in slow motion. In my opinion,
> > that is just cheap and lazy movie making. If they had sped up all the
> > action sequences in that movie it probably would have actually been an
> > hour long movie. I'm glad I didn't pay full price at the theaters for
> that
> > movie.
> > I paid matinee price ($8.50) on Sucker Punch so not too much money was
> > wasted on the slow motion sequences there.
> >
> > --
> > Have a Better One,
> > Edward Crosby
> > http://about.me/edwardcrosby
> > -----
> > "There are no atheists in foxholes or firmware updates."
> > Merlin Mann
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "The Unique Geek" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Unique Geek" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
>
> --
>  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Unique Geek" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Unique Geek" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/theuniquegeek?hl=en.

Reply via email to