Στις Sat, 5 Aug 2006 17:31:33 +0200 Ο/Η "David Tenser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> έγραψε:
> In Windows, a "samba" share is like > any other folder to the applications, because the support is > implemented in the system-level. In other words, it doesn't matter to > mplayer2.exe if I double-clicked on "C:\file.avi" or > "\\share\file.avi". To the application, both paths point to a file. > > This kind of transparent network support is what I'm really asking > for, but maybe it's not suitable in this Thunar-specific mailing list. > Gnome seems (?) to have started to implement this, but it looks like > they implemented it in the application-level (e.g. totem has support > for smb://.. URIs while rhytmbox doesn't). > > I have all my media (music, movies, etc) stored on my server which I > can access with samba or ssh. If I want to access these files, I need > to use e.g. Totem instead of Xfce's media player since the latter has > no support for network shares. > If you have some samba shares that you need to have constant access to, you can always create an fstab entry for them and mount them through smbfs/cifs. Then all will be transparent. The other solutions (like smb:// uris in gnome-vfs) are mere workarounds to enable occasional & quick access for non-priviledged users to those shares. -- Stavros Giannouris Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Hello. I'm a signature virus. Just copy me to your signature to help me spread"
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
