Danny Milosavljevic wrote: >>[...] the UI >>will still have to be updated to make sense or i.e. you'll get a "Move >>to Trash" for sshfs, although the trash spec doesn't allow remote files >>and the like[1], and of course at a way higher cost). > > Really? Why not? Put it in the remote trash... (still not ideal, I guess)
Maybe there's some "Remote Trash Specification" that I do not know of yet? ;-) > cheers, > Danny Benedikt _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
