Hi, On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:47:18 +0200, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> Danny Milosavljevic wrote: >>>[...] the UI >>>will still have to be updated to make sense or i.e. you'll get a "Move >>>to Trash" for sshfs, although the trash spec doesn't allow remote files >>>and the like[1], and of course at a way higher cost). >> >> Really? Why not? Put it in the remote trash... (still not ideal, I guess) > > Maybe there's some "Remote Trash Specification" that I do not know of > yet? ;-) Sorry, I only read the trash spec now (and implemented http://www.scratchpost.org/hacks/trasher/ :)). I see that the trash directory name uses the user ID instead of the name. baaad. I see the problem now :) cheers, Danny _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
