Stavros Giannouris wrote: >>>>[...] the UI >>>>will still have to be updated to make sense or i.e. you'll get a >>>>"Move to Trash" for sshfs, although the trash spec doesn't allow >>>>remote files and the like[1], and of course at a way higher cost). >>> >>>Really? Why not? Put it in the remote trash... (still not ideal, I >>>guess) >> >>Maybe there's some "Remote Trash Specification" that I do not know of >>yet? ;-) > > Last time I checked, the fd.o trash spec stated that you may not use > trash for remote filesystems. And this is my preference, too.
I was joking... there's of course no spec for remote trashing, and taking into account the variaty of file and operating systems in the network world, this wouldn't make sense at all. Just like trashing to the home trash (as Nautilus does -> "Move To Trash") doesn't make sense when browsing remote file systems (of course the situation is different when you're using an NFS mounted homedir, etc). Benedikt _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
