Carsten, is there a typo? Former: "Section 4.3 of [RFC3339] states that an offset given as Z or +00:00 implies that "UTC is the preferred reference point for the specified time".
Latter: "The offset -00:00 is provided as a way to express that "the time in UTC is known, but the offset to local time is unknown". > This convention mirrors a similar convention for date/time information in > email headers, described in Section 3.3 of [RFC5322] and introduced earlier > in Section 3.3 of [RFC2822]. > The latter convention is in actual use, while > the former always was handicapped by the fact that [ISO8601:1988] does not > actually allow -00:00. It seems that the -00:00 notation is the "latter", instead it ? I've seen +00:00 and -00:00 regularly in email. (Actually, I didn't know what -00:00 meant until I read this. It seems pretty common when email originates through Outlook.com) -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
