Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > That’s not what I called former/latter.
okay, I was asking because I was confused... which occurs easily.
> Whoever invented the adaptation of -00:00 to the RFC 3339 format
> did not have a copy of ISO 8601, did not bother to look, or didn’t
> think that the resulting incompatibility would be a problem in
> practice. Turns out, it actually is.
ISO8601 comes in two parts, each are CHF158.
You and I (and Carl and many others...) agree that limiting access by
charging for these documents is a serious problem. I think this is an
example.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
