> It's also worth pointing out here that the relation between Osmosoft and
> the core-development team is mostly coincidental - it's primarily that
> way because no outside developer has stepped up to become a regular core
> contributor.

Correction. From where I'm standing no outside developer has been
afforded the opportunity to become a regular core contributor. This
was a major factor in my decision to scale back time spent on
TiddlyWiki development. Where coincidental or not it is my sincere
belief that it is impossible to contribute to the TiddlyWiki core code
in any meaningful - other than forking the code - for anyone not
working at Osmosoft. I don't for a minute believe that there are any
sinister intentions behind this and it has been an unfortunate by-
product of the fact that Jeremy and Martin both work at Osmosoft..
it's just easier to discuss and develop with those you're in the same
room with. Sadly it means the rest of us don't get an opportunity to
weigh in and contribute. This isn't really meant as criticism, the
community has benefited greatly from the contributions Osmosoft has
made and this is just the flip side of the coin. However I do take
exception to the statement that no one else has "stepped" up.

> Yet (paraphrasing Chris[3]) there seems to be a perpetuating notion that
> Osmosoft is solely responsible for development, documentation,
> communication etc. - that I believe to be wrong and unfair

Solely responsible, definitely not. But fact is that Osmosoft has
restricted discussion on design and development to the Osmosoft circle
and has for the most part failed to share that with the rest of us in
an inclusive manner. In doing so they HAVE assumed a great deal of
responsibility. I don't think it is a coincidence that since the BT
acquisition of Osmosoft, quite a few previously very active TW
developers have gradually made themselves scarce, myself included. The
real danger in this scenario is that if Osmosoft were to decide to
divert focus from TW, it might create a void which otherwise would
have been filled by outside developers as part of the evolution of the
community.... but this might be better continued as a blog post about
the impact of a corporate entity like BT getting involved with an open-
source project.

Once again, I appreciate everything that Osmosoft brings to the
community and the TiddlyWiki ecosphere. While it has resulted in a
change in the way the community operates and has come with its share
of disadvantages, I'd probably wager that we're better off at this
point in time than we would have been without BT/Osmosoft.

Just my two cents worth as someone who I think has earnt the right to
have an opinion on all things TiddlyWiki. ;)
Cheers,
Saq
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to