> I would add one other thing that I think someone -- Wolfgang? -- who
> has more right to speak up than me -- the lack of documentation. The
> fact that an application like TiddlyWiki should have been around so
> long without systematic documentation of features, components,
> guidance regarding customization, etc., etc., is a bit on the
> ridiculous side. E.g., What exactly does a StyleSheet control? How's
> it related to PageTemplate? And on and on and on.
>

I think this assessment isn't fair Eric. After all, TiddlyWiki is an
OpenSource project with manpower too limited - considering the number
of projects all going at the same time. And one has to wonder, how
beside all these tasks, there was still some time left for actually
advancing the core. Open source projects stands or fall with the
contributions of a community. And this need has been met with help
TiddlyWikis of various individuals, and the unheard of help shoveled
on us here at GG:

TiddlerToddler
        http://tiddlertoddler.tiddlyspot.com/
TiddlyWiki Tips
        http://tiddlywikitips.com/
TiddlyWiki Tutorial - the basics
        http://www.blogjones.com/TiddlyWikiTutorial.html
TiddlyWiki for the rest of us
        http://www.giffmex.org/twfortherestofus.html
TiddlyWiki Help - a comprehensive guide
        http://twhelp.tiddlyspot.com/
Questions and Answers on TiddlyWiki
        http://twfaq.tiddlyspot.com/
Tiddly faqs
        http://www.tiddlytools.com/faq.html
TiddlyWiki.org Wiki
        http://tiddlywiki.org/wiki/Main_Page


Looking at it from a different angle, maybe other forces might be at
work we are not even be aware of, as the core developers close to
Osmosoft are.

Just made a quick survey of the last systemConfig update of all major
systemServers:

7 July 2009
        http://www.tiddlytools.com/

3 June 2009
        http://mptw.tiddlyspot.com/

14 April 2009
        http://tiddlywiki.abego-software.de/

6 Maio 2009
        http://www.math.ist.utl.pt/~psoares/addons.html

12 January 2009
        http://ptw.sourceforge.net/ptwe.html

30 September 2008
        http://tiddlywiki.bidix.info/

2 July 2008
        http://jackparke.googlepages.com/jtw.html

5 April 2008
        http://tw.lewcid.org/

18 January 2008
        http://visualtw.ouvaton.org/VisualTW.html

26 January 2007
        http://bradleymeck.tiddlyspot.com/

23 January 2007
        http://tiddlystyles.com/

26 December 2006
        http://solo.dc3.com/tw/

down at the moment:
        http://www.martinswiki.com/


But these dates still don't reveal the sad truth that the only one
which still came forwards with innovations during the last year is
only TiddlyTools!

>
> The seeds to this potential unraveling were sown when the decision was
> made to drastically change the TiddlyWiki core and subject all users
> to the vagueness of unfinished software on a regular basis for months
> or years.
>

Sure, all working at Osmosoft must be aware of this drainage of
contributing developers. And this blunt inclusion of jQuery library
into the core might only be a desperate attempt to avert a black hole,
without wanting to this communicate for good reasons?

best wishes..
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to