I could be wrong, but it looks like the feature has already been turned off. I did feel that the original list of tags was too broad.
On Friday, December 6, 2019 at 4:55:32 AM UTC-8, TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > In another thread ... > > Jeremy Ruston wrote: >> >> * Pinning should never have been globally available. I appreciate the >> argument that no great harm was done, but it evidently created confusion as >> to who could see that a thread had been pinned >> * We should agree on general rules for what threads might qualify for >> being pinned. To me, pinning would start with urgent announcements (e.g. if >> discovered a serious bug in a release and wanted to warn people to >> upgrade), important on-going informational threads like “Newbies start here” >> > > Ciao Jeremy > > In another thread > <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/gWtX7uGi2QQ/xg6sv0PICQAJ> we > discussing user v. admin privileges re PINS. > > Here I want to ask about TAGS. > > *First I just want to check IF you are aware that at the moment any user > can both add or delete TAGS on any post?* > > * +* In a way its v. good in that missing tags get added. > *+ *Its good that an original author who has not added them may have > them added by an enthusiastic user > > *-* in another way its not ideal as these don't get documented and the > numbers could get vast... > * - * I see no place user added tags get listed. > > For example, this post I gave tags: "question GoogleGroup tags" > > Tags have proved very useful for finding things here. But I'm not sure, > without moderated addition, they are optimal. > > Best wishes > TT > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7b416c3c-809f-4753-b52f-ad06ab6ff790%40googlegroups.com.
