Hi Tony > I did not want to high Jack the thread. But I thought this info important for > mohammadss different releases. I understand this may have a reason but surely > we could get dropped plugins to be saved into the node required locations to > bring these behaviors inline. It seems an unnesasary complication. I did not > notice so much because I tend to install my own macros a lot. It seems a > bridge too far for a user moving to a folder wiki. > > This possibly explains some odd behavior I have experienced with no messages. > > I will revisit this for myself but can we build a solution to bring them > inline?
It's done the way that it is to make it easier to keep the server secure. TiddlyWiki is designed to support scenarios where the server isn't under the control of the end user (as with e.g. TiddlySpot). In that scenario you wouldn't want browser users to be able to run arbitrary plugins on the server. Best wishes Jeremy > > Regards > Tony > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/09c310b4-84de-4eec-9241-8931c04f170f%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/EE029A31-61AE-4604-B1A3-A918B1330061%40gmail.com.
