Why can we have a second brand? Perhaps a new edition under that, and 
simply cross reference to "The tiddlywiki platform".

Perhaps a third brand and do A/B marketing perhaps one targeted at IT 
Literates and one to average Joe user. 

Regards
Tony

On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 at 3:24:56 PM UTC+11, Mark S. wrote:
>
> The way that it helps the newcomer is that it lets them know that the 
> product is OK to
> use in the first place. IT people often think only in terms of technology, 
> but most 
> other people interface with products via introducers and branding.
>
> The name "TiddlyWiki", unlike other products mentioned, has a name that 
> strongly 
> suggests something diminutive or child-like. This is not something that 
> people
> want to be associated with. In fact, it would be better to have a 
> pejorative or
> scatological name then something that suggests "child." You can have bad
> names and still succeed. But you can not give a product that suggests
> "toy" and have it widely accepted in the corporate and business world.
>
> But I see from the various posts that people don't understand the power of 
> marketing,
> or perhaps they believe that they are immune from its effects.  That is 
> part of the magic of 
> marketing, that people don't even know or recognize that they have been 
> marketed
> to, and that they are unconsciously making decisions based on aspects of a 
> product that are totally irrelevant.
>
>
> "...the Hitch-Hiker's Guide has already supplanted the great Encyclopaedia 
>> Galactica as the standard 
>> repository of all knowledge and wisdom, for though it has many omissions 
>> and contains much that is 
>> apocryphal, or at least wildly inaccurate, it scores over the older, more 
>> pedestrian work in two 
>> important respects.
>>
>> First, it is slightly cheaper; and secondly it has the words DON'T PANIC 
>> inscribed in large friendly letters on its cover."
>>
>   
>
>
> On Monday, February 17, 2020 at 7:56:50 PM UTC-8, Mohamed Amin wrote:
>
> As a relatively new user (8 months now) I strongly agree with Mark 
>> Kerrigan, 
>>
>> let me put my thoughts here (excuse my bad english):-
>>
>> 1- There are very successful Tools with bad names (
>> https://flask-wtf.readthedocs.io/en/stable/) ,or names that NOT reflect 
>> the current functionallty ("WordPress" name was reflecting the "Blogging" 
>> part , now it's CMS) 
>>
>> 2- All PR is good PR  (
>> https://www.skyword.com/contentstandard/can-bad-advertisements-good-brand/
>> ).
>>
>> 3- I agree that the name is not reflecting the functionally/capability of 
>> the tool (at least the "Wiki" part), BUT changing the name now (love to do 
>> that) will NOT help new user much.
>>
>> 4- I recently understand that introducing TW5 to the new user is REALLY 
>> hard, as it is very UNIQUE piece of Tool/Platform, and I think finding some 
>> ways to do that is the top priority for TW community.
>>
>> 5- We need to do a "TiddlyWiki BRANDING" by provide solutions/example 
>> that explane how this "2MB" master piece (most underrated tool) has :-
>> - The Philosophy of "non linear contents" (it is hard, but it works very 
>> good with "real life") 
>> - the idea of "Smallest information unit" (Tiddlers)
>> - the briliant of adding the "Meta Data" to the Tiddlers (Fields)
>> - The butty of UI cusomization (
>> http://novye-podarki.ru/heeg.html#%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3
>> )
>> - The Power of "Filter operation"
>> - WikiText
>> - Plugins
>> - MultiDimension Tool (Data Structure, Data Modeling, Query Language, 
>> Messaging, UI , .....) 
>> - SPA.
>> - Static Web Site Design/Generator
>> - JavaScript, Html, CSS Playground.
>> - ....
>> - ....
>>
>> P.S. : I fall in love with TW from the 1st sight :), just know that I'm 
>> 46Y IT Engineer, and I'm currently migrating all My Data/Information 
>> managments and some programming tasks to TiddlyWiki
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 at 3:42:35 AM UTC+2, Mark Kerrigan wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> I'm skeptical if switching away from the name TiddlyWiki will really 
>>> entice more people to start using TiddlyWiki. It seems more of the issues 
>>> are less about the name, but more of the initial technical hurdle to save 
>>> changes. TiddlyWiki requires the user to set up some sort of saving 
>>> mechanism. Obviously those of us here are all familiar with our chosen 
>>> particular method, but the initial user may not always figure out what will 
>>> be the most effective method for them, especially if they are using 
>>> TiddlyWiki in a constrained corporate environment.
>>>
>>> Just my 2 cents, but it would be a shame to change the name and concept 
>>> of tiddlers but still retain the same sort of underlying complexity and not 
>>> really create a large increase in the user base.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Mark Kerrigan
>>>
>>> On Monday, February 17, 2020 at 2:02:38 PM UTC-8, TonyM wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jeremy,
>>>>
>>>> Some carefully considered thoughts follow;
>>>>
>>>> I agree a name change may be necessary despite my contentment with it, 
>>>> others seem to read it differently, the recent podcaste that made 
>>>> reference 
>>>> to it is a case in point. However we have a clear legacy of plugins and 
>>>> editions and solutions out there for which searching tiddlywiki will find 
>>>> the results, as a result "tiddlywiki can not be forgotten", perhaps ever.
>>>>
>>>> Thus I think this needs a strategy to accompany a name change. One 
>>>> approach is to promote tiddlywiki with a catch phrase that sheds light on 
>>>> its function and potentially contains the new name, eventually the new 
>>>> name 
>>>> emerges from the catch phrase and becomes the primary name. With the 
>>>> community aware of this we have time with updates to get the new name 
>>>> embedded in material on the internet.
>>>>
>>>> In a previous discussion  I suggested starting with a catch phrase to 
>>>> accompany the name wherever possible of the top of my head, "Tiddlywiki a 
>>>> website, application, wiki database and a smart document platform". 
>>>> Personally I really like the broad word "platform" because it sounds 
>>>> complete and diverse whilst also "ready to go" out of the box.
>>>>
>>>> One thing is for sure that tiddlywiki and tiddler are sufficiently rare 
>>>> that they have served us well, choosing a new name badly could send us 
>>>> into 
>>>> search engine oblivion even if it describes tiddlywiki well.
>>>>
>>>> To find a name, Perhaps the first questions is where do we want people 
>>>> to see tiddlywiki? I think Wiki is a strong though incomplete way of 
>>>> describing tiddlywiki but wiki can be in the catch phrase, where else do 
>>>> we 
>>>> want it to be seen?
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps we can make it's key weakness an advantage, its weakness is its 
>>>> diversity of uses, where none should be emphasised over the others, so 
>>>> trawling the english language for an uncommon word that reflects this 
>>>> could 
>>>> be the source of a name, then we need to look for alternatives in other 
>>>> languages. Usually the larger words are common across multiple languages.
>>>>
>>>> Can we use the "TW" and redefine it in some way to Totally(awesome)Wiki 
>>>> platform. 
>>>>
>>>> I do think perhaps the release of TW6/X would be the time to re-label 
>>>> and the tiddler and tiddlywiki must remain in the empty file such as 
>>>> "[TotalWiki] the next generation of tiddlywiki". The references 
>>>> discussions 
>>>> and prior to this next generation needs to remain searchable and well 
>>>> known.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Tony
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sunday, February 16, 2020 at 5:28:06 AM UTC+11, bimlas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> A wave started which could make TiddlyWiki more and more famous. *Now* 
>>>>> we might need to make it really user-friendly, so that new people can 
>>>>> easily get over the initial difficulties and stay with Tiddly.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://hackaday.com/2020/02/14/it-aint-over-til-the-paperwork-is-done-test-driving-tiddlywiki/
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e61d641e-e127-4199-be1a-0b9be0957b9d%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to