Tony, I am using a single file wiki. I am not overly concerned about the upgrade process, but I noticed in the comments of some of those who upgraded there were some issues. I prefer to be prepared than be confronted with a nasty surprise.
So, if I understand you well, you're basically saying that if the PeterWiki-1 file gets messed up during upgrade, using PeterWiki-2 (not upgraded) will run on 5.1.21: is that correct? 16 Apr 2020, 12:54 by [email protected]: > Peter > > The upgrade mechanisium for single file wikis only upgrades the file its > given and you have to save the update and you can give it a new name rather > than save over your original. From past experience it is rare for the upgrade > to fail. At most a feature does not work or a minor artifact appears. > > The single file wiki is so simple to copy and backup even without automatic > backups in most savers. > > Regards > Tony > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/17528193-d5d8-4909-9512-ed4aacb045af%40googlegroups.com. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/M51SUHw--7-2%40tutamail.com.
