Hi,

Reacting to Mat's message below, stating :

> good elemental best practices in tiddlywiki, like the no compound tiddler 
> title 


In my use case, I couldn't do without compound tiddler title, i.e. titles 
prefixed by their types.

Any recommendations about how to improve my data model and data exploration 
solutions ?

= = = = = =

*My use case*

My use case is about multidisciplinary knowledge acquisition, exploration 
and consolidation.

I am dealing with the following Tiddlers categories:

   1. *Source*, information source - ex: "so An Analysis of Kant's Critique 
   of Pure Reason -- by author X"
   1. tagged with Domain(s), Thinker(s), Topic(s)
   2. *Domain*, Domain of Knowledge - ex: "do Philosophy"
      1. recursively tagging sub (sub (sub...)) domains, to form a tree of 
      domains, 
      2. the head of domains being called "do Domain"
   3. *Thinker*, the producer of the views in question - ex: "th Kant"
   4. *Topic, *the subjects discussed - ex: "to Reasoning", "to 
   Enlightenment", ...
   5. and *Notes, *summaries of the views exposed in the sources
      1. main note tagged with the source
      2. other notes tagged with it's father note (classical tagging way to 
      deal with large information)
      3. thus all these notes about this source form one / several tree(s) 
      of notes all going back to the source
      4. if a specific note is about a specific Thinker, Field or Topic, 
      that is not already mentioned in the source, then it is tagged with these 
      specific tags.
   

*At first: no compound titles, just tagging*

At first, all topics were tagged by Topic, all sources by Source, etc. and 
titles didn't contain a prefix.
But when I wanted to explore categories (i.e. main tags) all the data was 
mangled in the simplest data exploration tool I knew : the table of 
content, as in

<<toc-selective-expandable "Domain">>

   - includes all the domains and subdomains and subsubdomains in a nice 
   tree view
   - but also all the sources (indeed tagged by domains)
   - and all the notes (indeed tagged by sources, and by domains)
   - ...

and I did't want that. I just wanted to explore Domain names, and get more 
information only when I click on a specific domain name.

*Then: compound titles + tagging for visual separation*

To solve the above issue I thought : OK if data get mangled, but at least I 
want elements to be clearly grouped in the TOC display.

*Prefix* + alphabetical sort made it work. With the same 
<<toc-selective-expandable 
"Domain">>, I was better. I had all the sub *do*mains listed, then *th*inkers, 
then *to*pics, *so*urces. And notes in between these groups, because they 
had no prefix. At least I could easily find my subfields.

*Then: compound titles, no tagging for just what I need*

No more sources tagged with Source, thinkers tagged with thinkers, etc. 
Only using prefix to indicated the category.
One exception: Domains, because they are a tree. So each domain was tagged 
by its parent domain, and the top Domain being "do Domain"

With <<toc-selective-expandable "do Domain" "prefix[do ]">>, I could have 
the table of content display I was looking for : domains and subdomains.

*So....*

Are there any TW benefits I am using with these prefixes and lack of main 
tags categories ?

And could I have dealt with my issue in a better way ?


Best,
Eric N.
 



On Tuesday, April 28, 2020 at 5:10:39 PM UTC+4, TonyM wrote:
>
> Mat,
>
> Good Point "Best Practice" is often in a context, It is easy to design and 
> document a "Best  practice" in an oversimplified context. I believe 
> tiddlywiki can take on almost any context, so it is much harder to decide 
> on a best practice. What we do know is there are many "really Good 
> Practices", but its hard to choose one, so people don't publish them (so 
> often), they just try and do them.
>
> I think there are quite a few good elemental best practices in tiddlywiki, 
> like the no compound tiddler title etc.. but they too can change with the 
> context.
> [...]
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ef273898-aa42-47bd-bec3-e0f42371368c%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to