Ciao Jeremy In a way I was overstating. Venting pure *frustration* at the difficultly at sifting voluminous posts with a fork, not a system. You get my point?
The issue is EVERY POST becomes a singular. I'll comment on that later. I think it instances a real difficulty. Right now I'm trying to understand, test, apply, and, ultimately, use some of the recent (three months or so) innovations on using EDIT differently. That matters most to me. Writing is work I do. TW editor can be leveraged better, but you need look at solutions and sift them. That is the *background*. Many relevant innovations, but its one-by-one stumbling to get there right now. The CONTRADICTION is I'm now more of less able to understand innovation in TW--BUT find myself back on square one after a few days just being able to review. I see a forest, when trees woudl be workable This is not yet a proper answer. A dopo. Surbito. TT On Sunday, 3 May 2020 12:05:56 UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > Hi TiddlyTweeter > > I'm busy and not able to read here daily. Its i*nterestingly proved* a >> nightmare reading this group after a few days. So much richness at a whim >> of Google. >> > > Is there are any community software that doesn't have the problem that > it's hard to catch up with a large volume of posts? Does Reddit or Hacker > News do it any better? I would struggle to envisage any software features > that could significantly improve the situation. I believe the answer is > that we need humans to curate, summarise and index the useful information > that surfaces. I don't see any evidence that that is particularly easy to > automate; it takes human commitment and skill to do it. Dave's ToolMap and > Mohammad's TWScripts demonstrate how effective and how difficult it is. > It's hard to imagine software that could reconstruct either of those > resources from the raw discussion traffic. > > Best wishes > > Jeremy. > > > > > >> >> --- >> >> I think we are throwing away through Google Groups DECENT CONTINUITY. >> >> What we have is *genius innovators*. Some neglected. Some triumphant. >> Few able to collectivize for common good. >> >> NO mechanism here for that. >> >> Leverage is worked against by system. >> >> TT >> thoughts, again. >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/818f624f-e473-42e8-b975-7e0daa8d0bc5%40googlegroups.com.
