Ciao Jeremy Good post I thought about and looked at. This is my boiled down version in reply ...
1 - The internal search mechanism in GG sucks. I had thought to isolate "all but only" through it for a fortnight. Its still off by a big margin. I can find no way via search to reliably return posts about editing (my current interest). For reasons I don't know search in GG is often different that in GG search main. 2 - I do like ideas of curation, exact, reliable tagging etc. But aware its labour. The specific issue here is that the posts are OFTEN somewhat ahead of a classification. What I mean is that TW, currently, is not easily systematized. I think that compounds the issue. (1), would likely be done better in other online systems. Though I have not tested that. (2), Is interestingly iluminative; perhaps broadly doable with folk who grasp the basic parameters. Best wishes TT On Sunday, 3 May 2020 12:05:56 UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > Hi TiddlyTweeter > > I'm busy and not able to read here daily. Its i*nterestingly proved* a >> nightmare reading this group after a few days. So much richness at a whim >> of Google. >> > > Is there are any community software that doesn't have the problem that > it's hard to catch up with a large volume of posts? Does Reddit or Hacker > News do it any better? I would struggle to envisage any software features > that could significantly improve the situation. I believe the answer is > that we need humans to curate, summarise and index the useful information > that surfaces. I don't see any evidence that that is particularly easy to > automate; it takes human commitment and skill to do it. Dave's ToolMap and > Mohammad's TWScripts demonstrate how effective and how difficult it is. > It's hard to imagine software that could reconstruct either of those > resources from the raw discussion traffic. > > Best wishes > > Jeremy. > > > > > >> >> --- >> >> I think we are throwing away through Google Groups DECENT CONTINUITY. >> >> What we have is *genius innovators*. Some neglected. Some triumphant. >> Few able to collectivize for common good. >> >> NO mechanism here for that. >> >> Leverage is worked against by system. >> >> TT >> thoughts, again. >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0d049a07-d5fd-448b-b592-8a363c63aa29%40googlegroups.com.
