*Mat *I need to play around with TW, I don't remember no all the situations 
system tiddlers were in the way. I will be reporting more in the future 
regarding this. Tags dropdown is one place where like springer said, it 
would be great to "fold" system tags under "System tags" link in the 
dropdown.

–––

TonyM the thread now is divided into pagination, I don't know why. I guess 
too many messages. The lead post is still there.

It is dangerous to "Redesign" something to meet goals that have already 
> being achieved. 

It really depends who have those goals... I really don't think newcomer and 
content writer goals are met, there are broader audiences of people that 
could use TiddlyWiki, but they choose weaker tools, because they like the 
interface and usability better. Plenty of youtube review videos proving 
that.

But I can understand that from a power user perspective this seems like a 
lot of unnecessary effort.

But if we want to improve things for all, let's turn the approach of 
improving things upside down, let's define the far vision, and then reverse 
engineer the steps until there. That might involve a lot of tweaking of the 
vision and ideas. BUT there are still bigger chances to end up where you 
want to be, rather than keep patching things, pulling to different 
directions that does not belong to one common vision. The design proposal 
has no means of jumping to final implementation. It's an iteration, and it 
requires patience to keep going with uncertainty. It's an invitation to 
explore the future vision, without being limited by existing constraints. 
And if there are too big of constraints, then why we are talking that TW is 
so modular and everyone can modify it to their own needs??

I like this pop quote, somewhat related:

*"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we 
> created them."  ~ A. Einstein*


–––

Thomas is it possible to download the whole icon pack at one? In my opinion 
the TW icons a quite bold/thick, introduces a lot of visual weight. I with 
there was a thinner, and more simplified 
version, maybe not so "soft/rounded" also to reduce the particular styling.

–––
I guess let's move to the TiddlyWikiUI group:) 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/83823de7-36fd-4268-bbd0-5cc156c21cbd%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to