Hans Has anyone made a wiki of single characters? One per Tiddler.
It would be an interesting experiment. Let's do it. TT On Wednesday, 3 June 2020 22:41:11 UTC+2, HansWobbe wrote: > > I think the ultimate answer to *"When does a part stop being a fragment?" > *may be "when the fragment is Indivisible.". > > Of course, that depends on the tools at one's disposal. I recall Physics > teachers explaining that Electrons,Neutrons and Protons were called > "sub-atomic" part-icles because the prior generation though that the Atom > was the smallest, indivisible object. And as an engineer, I was taught > that the difference between analog signals (messy Fourrier wholes) and > digiat signals was that, in the digital realm, there were only 0 and 1. > > Now, with Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Computing, I am only *probably *sure > I can say "I think, therefore I am.". > > In the scope and context of TiddlyWiki, I have come to appreciate that *a > Character is the smallest practical Part* (glibly over-looking that there > are 4 bits to a Nibble and 2 Nibbles to a Byte and as many as possible 2^31 > characters in the UniCode character set). > > For me, that makes a unicode character the smallest possible fragment. I > am also relatively certain that, since a Character is Indivisible, it can > only be divided by 1 or itself ... which is really neat since it means > Characters are like Prime numbers! > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b4948619-adaa-4c20-800c-1b740d1a9178o%40googlegroups.com.
