Yes, Relink is about being able to rename tiddlers without having any 
markup links to them go cold. But given how many of us found it to be 
essential, I believe it's been brought into the core for a while now (since 
5.1.14). So if you're just starting up you should already see an option box 
appear, when you rename a tiddler, to verify that you want the links to 
follow along. (Sometimes you might specifically *not* want the links to 
follow, so it's great that it's de-selectable.)

On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 7:54:15 AM UTC-5 Cl0d wrote:

> @springer : Alright. That lowers my fear of messing up my data. Got you, 
> that's also what I saw on your teaching Wiki. You have a red outline and 
> yellow background for definitions for example, which, as you say, tells us 
> clearly that we're looking at a definition.
>
> @Charlie Veniot : I'm sorry if I sound dumb, but I don't understand what 
> could be the use of "relink". Is it related to the dynamic modification of 
> links ? So basically, whenever you change a title, it gets updated 
> everywhere thanks to relink ?
>
> Thanks :)
> On Friday, 27 November 2020 at 00:06:29 UTC+1 springer wrote:
>
>> Cl0d,
>>
>> You'll find people here at both extremes: some use one massive TW5 as a 
>> repository for everything, figuring that this path makes maximal room for 
>> connections even across domains that may seem separate.
>>
>> My own approach is different largely because I like to have TW5 files 
>> that I can share with different audiences, without worrying that something 
>> intended for one audience would be distracting or even inappropriate for 
>> another audience. Obviously, that holds for a project devoted to a 
>> particular university course. I also set up a TW5 for a committee I chair; 
>> it's locked down with an encryption password and includes notes that aren't 
>> appropriately shared except with others on the committee (though I don't 
>> naively upload anything to an online repository like GitHub that is 
>> super-sensitive). For another example, folks at the TWGG know that I just 
>> set up a super-minimal TW5 for hosting the images connected with the 5.1.23 
>> logo contestants. Anyone who visits that wiki can poke around the "Recent" 
>> list without being confused by a long list of irrelevant things. Many 
>> plugins offer demo TW5 pages that are similarly stand-alone. I enjoy 
>> developing each of my projects with a distinctive color scheme and style 
>> set so that it feels like I'm arriving in a different "work environment" 
>> when I shift from one project to another.
>>
>> Whichever way you go, you should be reassured that dragging tiddlers 
>> between files, or filtering and exporting a JSON batch and dropping it onto 
>> a different TW5, allows you to engage in fusion or fission as needed down 
>> the road.
>>
>> -Springer
>> On Thursday, November 26, 2020 at 4:13:44 PM UTC-5 Cl0d wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you for your answer.
>>>
>>> It can without a doubt serve, I'd say, unlimited purposes. And the fact 
>>> that you outlined that, made me realize something I internally knew since 
>>> the first day I started using TiddlyWiki : the way you organize TW, greatly 
>>> depends on what you do with it.
>>>
>>> I have flown over both plugins tutorials and I'm going to try them out 
>>> on one of my test Wiki's, to see how I can use them. 
>>>
>>> Your site is amazing. This is definetly the kind of organization I'm 
>>> looking forward to achieve.
>>>
>>> I hope you don't mind me asking this question, but do you use TW for 
>>> other purposes ? I'm asking because, I couldn't get my head around a 
>>> question, which is, should I use only one Wiki for everything ?
>>>
>>> To give you an example, I read a lot of books and I take plenty of notes 
>>> and I also write extended documentations about computer science. Now, what 
>>> I'm doing right now, is creating one Wiki per subject. So I have a Wiki for 
>>> programming, one for everything that's related to pentesting, one for 
>>> system related things, one containing all my notes on books etc.
>>>
>>> I don't really know if this is going to be sustainble once I'll start 
>>> transfering all the information to TW.
>>>
>>> Said like this, it might sound trivial, but I feel like if I mess up my 
>>> '"entry" in TW, it's going to be hard to get everything straight later on.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, 26 November 2020 at 20:57:15 UTC+1 springer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cl0d, exactly what I find marvelous about TiddlyWiki is how much it can 
>>>> be molded to very different purposes. I maintain different TW5 projects 
>>>> for 
>>>> different purposes, with different plugin sets and other customizations 
>>>> suited to the purposes of each project. 
>>>>
>>>> Two things that I suspect I do more than most people are:
>>>>
>>>> (1) Make a dynamic table, using the Shiraz plugin,  for virtually every 
>>>> important tag. It offers a great compact way to get the big picture on any 
>>>> slice that interests me. I used to use TOC-style tiddlers for this 
>>>> purpose, 
>>>> and that structure still has uses, but the dynamic table is more powerful. 
>>>> I love that I can structure each such dynamic table to focus on the fields 
>>>> that are important for that particular tag. (Of course, you can build a 
>>>> dynamic table around criteria other than tags, but that's my main 
>>>> workhorse 
>>>> use.) I also tend to populate my stylesheet with tag-specific css, so that 
>>>> there are clear visual cues as to which kind of tiddler we're looking at. 
>>>> (I use TW for teaching. So, a quiz question tiddler has a look and feel 
>>>> that differs from an author-specific tiddler or a definition tiddler or a 
>>>> tiddler focused on excerpts from the readings, etc.)
>>>>
>>>> (2) Liberally employ a "details" GUI for things that I don't want to 
>>>> see (or don't want to show to students) unless/until it's time to dig in 
>>>> deeper. I use telmiger's details plugin, because it's super-flexible about 
>>>> the contents within the details area (allows any formatting or markup you 
>>>> can think of within the hidden "pocket" area). But to put ordinary text 
>>>> elaboration into a details "pocket," Shiraz's details function is simple 
>>>> and great too.
>>>>
>>>> If you'd like to poke around on one of my teaching sites, feel free to 
>>>> visit this link: 
>>>> https://springerspandrel.github.io/tw/ethicsatwes.html#TiddlyWiki
>>>>
>>>> Enjoy the adventure of discovering the possibilities!
>>>>
>>>> -Springer 
>>>> On Thursday, November 26, 2020 at 2:06:10 PM UTC-5 Cl0d wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>
>>>>> Been using TiddlyWiki for a few weeks now. I'm still learning how to 
>>>>> cope with the enormous potential offered by TiddlyWiki.
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, I discovered today that it was possible to create a 
>>>>> dynamic table of content using keywords. 
>>>>>
>>>>> So I was wondering, what are your best practices, or let's say, 
>>>>> advices, for using TiddlyWiki ? How does your "basic wiki" look like ? 
>>>>> What 
>>>>> plugins and/or custom features do you use ? 
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm still in a transitional phase, meaning that I'm writing my new 
>>>>> notes in TiddlyWiki to get used to it and I'm at the same time trying to 
>>>>> discover new tools to organize my future wiki's in the best way possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance for every answer.
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ac82b55a-1dab-410d-ac72-f9d3456a49b5n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to