They all work *in situ*. And they all might be the basis of something rebooted. They just might not be the first choice for immediate use in a modern TW. So, how to gently convey that subtlety?
On Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 2:44:18 AM UTC-7 TiddlyTweeter wrote: > [email protected] wrote: > >> "Vintage" sounds desirable nowadays! We need to communicate that this >> stuff is no longer usable, so maybe "Obsolete"? The description can explain >> why it's still worth including. >> > > TBH, I'm getting CONFUSED! :-) > > *Obsolete / Vintage / Oldish. *REALLY? > > GIVE me aggregation of WHAT WORKS out-of-the-box WITHOUT ageism. > That is enough already! > > TT > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8864939e-043e-47e5-810d-af86f62227efn%40googlegroups.com.
