"Vintage" sounds desirable nowadays! We need to communicate that this stuff is no longer usable, so maybe "Obsolete"? The description can explain why it's still worth including.
Best wishes Jeremy -- Jeremy Ruston [email protected] https://jermolene.com > On 24 Mar 2021, at 20:13, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 12:38:18 PM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: >> >>> My thought about older items is that a single link to an older item could >>> be the starting point for someone to make something amazing. Like various >>> television reboots that are more interesting than the original, but benefit >>> from the starting point. >> >> Yes that's very true. Perhaps we should agree a tag for this kind of >> situation. >> > "Old" is pejorative. "Classic" is taken. Maybe "Vintage" ? > > >>> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e3f7a5ac-231d-47e4-9d5c-f624e783a734n%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/718ED101-A00A-46EB-B450-2177C32B9509%40gmail.com.
