Hi Mark > Fixed skplugins. I've added URL counting to my working dashboard.
Thanks, that's great. > My thought about older items is that a single link to an older item could be > the starting point for someone to make something amazing. Like various > television reboots that are more interesting than the original, but benefit > from the starting point. Yes that's very true. Perhaps we should agree a tag for this kind of situation. > It's good to know I don't need to stress so much about descriptions. > > Which reminds me -- will there be a search engine at some point? If not, than > descriptions are somewhat moot. Yes! I'll do a little JavaScript search function as soon as I get a chance, unless anyone beats me to it... Best wishes Jeremy > > Thanks! > >> On Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 12:09:39 PM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: >> Permalink seems to be available on skplugins, but the other two are indeed >> too old for them. And indeed are so old that we probably shouldn’t be >> promoting the information they contain too hard. >> >> Best wishes >> >> Jeremy >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> On 24 Mar 2021, at 17:03, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> I've gone through and removed or disambiguated duplicates except for these >>> older pages where it's not possible to permalink (AFAIK) : >>> >>> http://tiddlystuff.tiddlyspot.com/ 3 >>> http://skplugins.tiddlyspot.com/ 4 >>> http://tw5magick.tiddlyspot.com/ 5 >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 7:29:46 AM UTC-7 Mark S. wrote: >>>> Note that some links that have the same landing page actually have >>>> different descriptions and Tags. This is usually because the page was made >>>> before permalinks were available. >>>> >>>> Older TW's didn't have the permalink button, but did they still have >>>> permalinks? Is their some backward compatible code that could generate >>>> them? >>>> >>>> Is there a handy filter that would detect duplicate url's without nesting? >>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 6:53:20 AM UTC-7 [email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>>> One thing I’m noticing is that you have multiple $:/tags/Link entries >>>>> pointing to the same URL. It doesn’t break the system or anything, but >>>>> perhaps it would make more sense for the scraper to merge multiple >>>>> entries with the same URL from the same contributor. We would merge the >>>>> tags, and concatenate the descriptions. Alternately, I could make you a >>>>> script that you could paste into the JS console to do that merging on >>>>> your original bookmarks. >>>>> >>>>> Best wishes >>>>> >>>>> Jeremy >>>>> >>>>>>> On 24 Mar 2021, at 13:40, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>> Saq's page is very nice, but he didn't extract the url or apply tags, so >>>>>> it's actually harder to use than the source MD. >>>>>> >>>>>> My methodology. I use an advanced text editor and split the original >>>>>> text into fields with pipes. >>>>>> I paste the text into an "incoming" tiddler. >>>>>> I've written a tiddler that will split the incoming items, apply >>>>>> specified tags, populate the url field, and add a unique identifier to >>>>>> avoid tiddler name collisions. >>>>>> Then I use a dashboard tiddler to browse the new entries. This makes it >>>>>> easier to browse the new entries, change tags, long text, and url. I can >>>>>> also click on a link to check if the link is working. Often I would >>>>>> tweak the link to use the exact permalink. Tiddlers can then be approved >>>>>> or marked as a problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is done in batches by sub-topics to help reduce errors. Rinse. >>>>>> Repeat. >>>>>> >>>>>> Of the various steps, it is checking the link that is slowest -- having >>>>>> to look back and forth, and often authors "hide" the bit you want. I >>>>>> checked each link for the first 218 submissions. After that I decided to >>>>>> mark items for review and come back and double-check links later, like >>>>>> when I was really bored. Of the next 50 I added, ONE had a missing url >>>>>> problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 3:19:19 AM UTC-7 Mohammad wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 1:34 PM Saq Imtiaz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> @Birthe and @Mohammad: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is the same content but should be a lot less resource intensive >>>>>>>>> to work with: >>>>>>>>> https://saqimtiaz.github.io/sq-tw/streams-tiddlytoolmap2.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks Saq! This is much suitable to create the entries for TW link >>>>>>>> aggregator. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 8:24:06 AM UTC+1 [email protected] >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Mohammad, >>>>>>>>> Is this the link? >>>>>>>>> https://saqimtiaz.github.io/sq-tw/streams-tiddlytoolmap.html I do not >>>>>>>>> remember the link, but I think Mark S did something similar testing >>>>>>>>> notowritey. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Birthe >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> onsdag den 24. marts 2021 kl. 06.05.51 UTC+1 skrev Mohammad: >>>>>>>>>> Hi Mark, >>>>>>>>>> I really appreciate your efforts! I think you should develop a >>>>>>>>>> small code to do the conversion from Toolmap to link aggregator! I >>>>>>>>>> know Saq converted Toolmaps entry to TW tiddlers sometimes ago, but >>>>>>>>>> I forgot the link to that Tiddlywiki! >>>>>>>>>> I know this work is tedious and like you I think the current >>>>>>>>>> configuration is not the best! Like you I think Jeremy shall remove >>>>>>>>>> the restriction on description, ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best wishes >>>>>>>>>> Mohammad >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 9:03 AM 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Out of nearly 300 entries, less than 1% had url errors. I was >>>>>>>>>>> hoping to do follow-ups with the w3c link validator, but it doesn't >>>>>>>>>>> recognize the site as a document. The standard link-checker >>>>>>>>>>> software said everything was ok, but obviously that's wrong. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've removed the entry with a bad url. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I will stop working for now. It's VERY tedious condensing >>>>>>>>>>> descriptions to 10 words and supplying tags. Mistakes are bound to >>>>>>>>>>> happen. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The last thing I need is to find people upset with my work. If >>>>>>>>>>> requested, I can roll back existing entrees. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 6:25:32 PM UTC-7 [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> There should also be a tag to indicate "highest supported >>>>>>>>>>>>> version" or something similar if relevant (for plugins, for >>>>>>>>>>>>> example) and its known. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 8:09:59 PM UTC-5 David Gifford >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There should be a way to report dead links. LibreNote, for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> example, turns up a 404. Someone is adding links without even >>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking them first. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, giffmex.org has been https:// since early 2020. If those >>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding links to giffmex.org could convert them from http: to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https:, that would be appreciated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>>>>> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/02dd9f80-b088-44d4-ae1b-c07f8d253130n%40googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/556e327f-0f2f-4636-8a78-3cc27d86040cn%40googlegroups.com. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2a094dd7-1d08-44cc-bb7d-5a74a687199en%40googlegroups.com. >>>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "TiddlyWiki" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to [email protected]. >> >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/1443feec-634b-481d-a15c-895cc8f39ea8n%40googlegroups.com. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b76a0d16-3e0e-44e5-aaf5-92dae7607273n%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/51B00BEF-213E-4B36-A22F-0318D96B744F%40gmail.com.
